Subject :
O R D E R
The matter is listed in Chamber for passing order in the IA No.101526 of 2021 in Miscellaneous Application No. 16590/2021 preferred by the applicant herein.
The applicant-in-person appearing through virtual mode, persistently urged that the I.A No. 184064/2022 preferred by her seeking recall of the order dated 04-11-2022, passed in IA No. 101526 of 2021 in MA No. 16590/2021 has still not been decided and thus, before proceeding further with the IA No. 101526 of 2021 in MA No. 16590/2021, this Court should consider the prayer made in the interlocutory application.
The application (I.A No. 101526 of 2021 in MA No. 16590/2021)
afore-stated has been preferred by the applicant with the following prayers:-
“a. Direct the registry to register the appeal against the registrar order filed as Miscellaneous Application Diary No. 16590 of 2021 discarding the defect of requiring to file application to appear and argue in-person under Miscellaneous Application Diary No. 16590 of 2021 since the said application has already been submitted under the main case (Contempt Petition (Civil) Diary No. 6007 of 2021) under which the appeal filed against the registrar order (Miscellaneous Application Diary No. 16590 if 2021)
has been filed.
b. Direct the registry not to insist on filing of application to appear and argue in- person under Miscellaneous Application Diary No. 16590 of 2021 since the said application has already been submitted under the main case (Contempt Petition (Civil) Diary No. 6007 of 2021) under which the appeal filed against the registrar order (Miscellaneous Application Diary No. 16590 of 2021)
has been filed.”
In order to appreciate the prayer made in the application (IA No. 184064/2022), this Court takes note of the record of proceedings in the present matter. The Miscellaneous Application No. 16590/2021 came to be listed in Chambers on 8-11-2021 & 30-09- 2022. On both these dates, the applicant was neither present nor was represented and thus, the matter was deferred. On 4-11-2022, when the matter was called out in Chambers before Hon’ble Mr.
Justice M.M. Sundresh, the following order was passed:-
“Three weeks’ time is granted to cure the defect(s).”
Thus, it is apparent that no consideration was made on merits of the application and the applicant was simply given time to cure the defects.
The matter thereafter was taken up in Chambers by Hon’ble Mr.
Justice Dipankar Dutta on 17-07-2023 on which, no one appeared and the matter was deferred by three weeks.
On 31-08-2023, the matter was listed in Chambers before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar, on which date, the applicant made a request to recall the order dated 04-11-2022 on which, the following order came to be passed:-
“Since the applicant is seeking for recalling of the order dated 04.11.2022, Registry is directed to list this matter before the Bench presided by the Hon’ble Judge who passed the order dated 04.11.2022 after obtaining orders from Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India.”
The matter was then listed in Chambers before different Benches on 10-11-2023, 01-12-2023 and 05-01-2023 and was adjourned on the request of the applicant.
Today, the applicant-in-person appearing through virtual mode vehemently and fervently contended that her application seeking recall of the order dated 04-11-2022 has not been decided and thus, the case is required to be posted before Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.M Sundresh.
This Court feels that the prayer so made by the applicant is misconceived. On 04-11-2022 the Court simply granted three weeks’ time to the applicant to cure the defects in the M.A No. 16590/2021. If the applicant entertains a belief that her application was not defective, she could always file an objection against the office report. Hence, the prayer made by the applicant- in-person to direct that the matter should be placed before Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh is turned down and I.A No. 184064/2022 is dismissed.
List the matter in Court for appropriate directions.
(RASHMI DHYANI PANT) (RAM SUBHAG SINGH)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
Supreme Court Rules Criminal Courts Must Not Act As Recovery Agents For Disputed Dues
27 Jul 2026
Rajya Sabha Bill Seeks To Criminalize Vande Mataram Disruption Under The National Honour Act
27 Jul 2026
Will Competitive Exams Deplete Delhi District Courts of Judges During Crucial Trial Proceedings This Year?
27 Jul 2026
Bombay High Court Adjourns Defamation Case Involving Union Minister Nitin Gadkari And Online Media Platforms
28 Jul 2026
Rajasthan High Court Directs State to Form Separate Wings for Crime Investigation and Security
28 Jul 2026
Gujarat High Court Upholds Constitutionality Of CGST Section 16 2 c Denying Unpaid Input Tax
28 Jul 2026
Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues New Guidelines For Legal Aid Defense Counsel System
28 Jul 2026
Government Introduces Public Examinations Amendment Bill 2026 In Lok Sabha To Curb Exam Paper Leaks
28 Jul 2026
Should Delhi High Court Increase Pecuniary Jurisdiction of District Courts to ₹10 Crore Threshold?
28 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.