Section 138 NI Act and Evidence Act Sections 137/138
Subject : Criminal Law - Negotiable Instruments Act
In a significant development for ongoing litigation under the Negotiable Instruments (NI) Act, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh has provided crucial clarity regarding the right of parties to re-examine witnesses. Justice Subhendu Samanta, presiding over P V Rajalakshmi vs G V Srinivas Rao , underscored the limits of judicial discretion when a party seeks to clarify testimony elicited during the often lengthy cross-examination process.
The case, originating from a Section 138 NI Act complaint filed in 2012, had faced significant delays. The examination-in-chief of PW.
Negotiable Instruments - Evidence Act - Witness Examination - Fair Trial - Judicial Discretion - Cross-Examination
#NIAct #TrialProcedure
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
SC Rules Walking on Footpaths is Fundamental Right
19 Jun 2026
Accommodation Requests Do Not Constitute Mala Fide Transfers: MP High Court Upholds Government Authority
23 Jun 2026
Denial of 7th Pay Commission to NHM Employees Despite Approved Service Bye-laws is Arbitrary: Punjab & Haryana High Court
23 Jun 2026
Arbitrary Termination of Long-Term Workers Illegal: Orissa HC
29 Jun 2026
POCSO Court Awards Death Penalty to 65-Year-Old Convict
30 Jun 2026
Senior Citizens Act Cannot Be Invoked for Title Disputes Unless Section 23 Applies: Allahabad High Court
04 Jul 2026
Vague And Nebulous Allegations Do Not Warrant Judicial Interference In Policy Matters: Patna High Court
04 Jul 2026
12-Year Possession Mandatory To Resist Land Eviction: Jharkhand HC
04 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.