Case Law
Subject : Criminal Law - Bail Matters
JODHPUR, RAJASTHAN – The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur has granted bail to two police constables, Hanuman Ram and Suresh Kumar, who were arrested in connection with allegedly manipulating an investigation under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The decision, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mukesh Rajpurohit, hinged on the principle of parity, as the main co-accused, the then Station House Officer (SHO) Smt. Seema Jakhar, had already been granted bail.
The case originates from F.I.R. No. 143/2021 registered at Police Station Barlot, District Sirohi. The petitioners, Hanuman Ram and Suresh Kumar, were serving as constables at the station. According to the prosecution's allegations, a police team had recovered a large quantity of contraband (poppy straw) from an abandoned vehicle.
However, the petitioners, allegedly in connivance with their superior, SHO Smt. Seema Jakhar, accepted an illegal gratification of Rs. 10 lakhs from other co-accused individuals. In return, they allegedly manipulated the investigation, allowed the drug traffickers to escape, and falsified official records (Rojnamcha) to report that the suspects had fled the scene.
The constables were booked under Sections 27-A (financing illicit traffic) and 59 (failure of officer in duty) of the NDPS Act, along with Section 221 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for intentionally omitting to apprehend an offender.
Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr. Vishal Sharma and Mr. Vijay Raj Bishnoi, representing the constables, argued primarily on the grounds of parity. They highlighted that the primary co-accused, SHO Smt. Seema Jakhar, had already been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of the High Court in July 2022. They also pointed out that another co-accused, Hemaram, was granted bail in February 2022.
The defense counsel further submitted that the charge sheet (challan) has been filed, meaning the investigation is complete. They assured the court that the petitioners, being public servants, posed no flight risk. Given that the petitioners have been in judicial custody since July and September 2024 respectively, and the trial is expected to be lengthy, they prayed for the benefit of bail.
Counsel for the State: Learned Public Prosecutor, Mr. H.S. Jodha, vehemently opposed the bail applications. He informed the court that the State has challenged the bail granted to SHO Seema Jakhar by filing a bail cancellation application (S.B. CRLBC No.75/2024), which is pending consideration before the High Court. The prosecutor argued that while the petitioners were subordinate to the SHO, they were equally responsible for the commission of the serious offence.
After considering the rival submissions, Justice Mukesh Rajpurohit found merit in the petitioners' plea. The court's decision was based on several key factors:
In its order, the court stated:
"Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, considering the fact that the charge sheet has already been filed, co-accused Smt. Seema Jakhar and Hema Ram have already been enlarged on bail, trial of the case will take sufficiently long time and looking to the custody period of the petitioners, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail."
Consequently, the bail applications were allowed. Hanuman Ram and Suresh Kumar are to be released on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.
The court, however, added a crucial rider, making the bail conditional on the outcome of the SHO's bail cancellation plea. It clarified that if any adverse order is passed in the pending application against Smt. Seema Jakhar, the Public Prosecutor would be at liberty to seek cancellation of the present bail granted to the constables.
#Bail #NDPSAct #RajasthanHighCourt
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Ex-Parte Order Without Notice or Jurisdiction Constitutes 'Gross Abuse of Process': Rajasthan High Court
15 Jun 2026
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Calcutta HC Questions Speaker’s Power to Appoint LoP
16 Jun 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.