Case Law
Subject : Environmental Law - Wildlife Protection and Conservation
The Supreme Court of India has upheld a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order halting mining activities near the Similipal-Hadgarh-Kuldiha-Similipal elephant corridor in
The case stemmed from an original application filed by the Rural Organisation for Social Empowerment before the NGT in 2019. The application challenged the granting of stone quarry leases near the Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary and its associated eco-sensitive zone, notified in 2017. The NGT, after reviewing reports and inspections, ordered the cessation of mining operations within and in the vicinity of the crucial elephant corridor. Leaseholders appealed this decision to the Supreme Court.
The appellants argued that their quarries were outside the eco-sensitive zone and that the NGT's order violated principles of natural justice by not individually hearing them. They maintained their leases were valid and that halting operations caused them significant financial losses.
The
The Supreme Court, while recognizing the valid leases of the appellants, emphasized the paramount importance of protecting the elephant corridor. The court noted that the NBWL (National Board for Wildlife) had conditionally approved the quarrying operations, subject to the implementation of the CWMP. Justice Rao 's judgment highlights the following key points from the PCCF (HoFF) report: the elephant corridor's critical role, the environmental impact of quarrying, and the non-implementation of the CWMP despite its approval.
The Court's final decision mandates the State of
This judgment establishes a strong precedent for balancing development and environmental conservation, prioritizing the protection of wildlife corridors. While acknowledging the economic interests of the leaseholders, the court underscores the critical importance of environmental regulations and the need for rigorous compliance with environmental management plans. The court’s decision sends a clear message: environmental protection trumps economic interests when critical wildlife habitats are threatened. The decision emphasizes proactive conservation measures and a holistic approach to environmental management in areas of ecological significance.
#EnvironmentalLaw #WildlifeConservation #SupremeCourtIndia #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Dismisses FIR Plea Against Rahul Gandhi
01 May 2026
Arbitrary Road Height Raising Banned Without Approval: Patna HC Enforces SOP, Penalizes Contractors
01 May 2026
Delhi HC Closes ANI's Copyright Suit Against PTI After Amicable Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC
01 May 2026
Post-Conviction NDPS Bail Can't Be Granted Solely on Long Incarceration; Section 37 Twin Conditions Mandatory: J&K&L High Court
01 May 2026
Defying Transfer Order Justifies Removal from Service Despite Family Care Plea: Orissa High Court
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
Administrative Actions Judged on Materials at Time of Decision, Not Subsequent Developments: Patna High Court
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.