Case Law
Subject : Environmental Law - Wildlife Protection and Conservation
The Supreme Court of India has upheld a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order halting mining activities near the Similipal-Hadgarh-Kuldiha-Similipal elephant corridor in
The case stemmed from an original application filed by the Rural Organisation for Social Empowerment before the NGT in 2019. The application challenged the granting of stone quarry leases near the Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary and its associated eco-sensitive zone, notified in 2017. The NGT, after reviewing reports and inspections, ordered the cessation of mining operations within and in the vicinity of the crucial elephant corridor. Leaseholders appealed this decision to the Supreme Court.
The appellants argued that their quarries were outside the eco-sensitive zone and that the NGT's order violated principles of natural justice by not individually hearing them. They maintained their leases were valid and that halting operations caused them significant financial losses.
The
The Supreme Court, while recognizing the valid leases of the appellants, emphasized the paramount importance of protecting the elephant corridor. The court noted that the NBWL (National Board for Wildlife) had conditionally approved the quarrying operations, subject to the implementation of the CWMP. Justice Rao 's judgment highlights the following key points from the PCCF (HoFF) report: the elephant corridor's critical role, the environmental impact of quarrying, and the non-implementation of the CWMP despite its approval.
The Court's final decision mandates the State of
This judgment establishes a strong precedent for balancing development and environmental conservation, prioritizing the protection of wildlife corridors. While acknowledging the economic interests of the leaseholders, the court underscores the critical importance of environmental regulations and the need for rigorous compliance with environmental management plans. The court’s decision sends a clear message: environmental protection trumps economic interests when critical wildlife habitats are threatened. The decision emphasizes proactive conservation measures and a holistic approach to environmental management in areas of ecological significance.
#EnvironmentalLaw #WildlifeConservation #SupremeCourtIndia #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt
Madras HC Directs Municipality to Auction Amusement Rides Licenses on Vaigai Riverbed for Chithirai Festival: Madurai Bench
17 Apr 2026
TCS Nashik Accused Seek Bail in Harassment Probe
17 Apr 2026
Insurer Liable for Gratuitous Passenger in Goods Vehicle, Can Recover from Owner: Kerala High Court
17 Apr 2026
MP High Court Issues Notice in PIL Alleging Disrespect to National Song 'Vande Mataram' by Indore Councillors: Article 51A(a)
17 Apr 2026
Bombay HC Grants NSE Ad-Interim Relief Against Fake Social Media Accounts Infringing 'NSE' Trademark: Platforms Must Takedown in 36 Hours
18 Apr 2026
Supreme Court Tags Challenges to UP Gangsters Act with Similar Organised Crime Laws from Gujarat, Maharashtra: Refers to 3-Judge Bench
18 Apr 2026
Loan Repayments for Assets Can't Reduce Maintenance Under Section 144 BNSS: Supreme Court
18 Apr 2026
Fernandez Seeks to Turn Approver in ₹200 Cr PMLA Case
18 Apr 2026
Prosecution Can't Gatekeep Witnesses: Rajasthan HC Directs Summoning of Doctor Under Section 311 CrPC for Just Decision
18 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.