Centre Bolsters Judiciary: 16 Judges Appointed Across Five High Courts, New Itanagar Bench Inaugurated

New Delhi – In a significant move to strengthen the Indian higher judiciary, the Ministry of Law and Justice has notified the appointment and extension of sixteen judges across the High Courts of Andhra Pradesh, Calcutta, Delhi, Chhattisgarh, and Karnataka. The notifications, released on August 8, 2025, follow recommendations made by the Supreme Court Collegium on July 28, 2025. This development coincides with the inauguration of a state-of-the-art building for the Gauhati High Court's Itanagar Permanent Bench, a move hailed as a major step towards enhancing access to justice in the Northeast.

These appointments, sanctioned by the President of India under Articles 217(1) and 224(1) of the Constitution, are expected to alleviate the burden on some of the country's busiest courts, which have been grappling with significant vacancy rates and mounting case pendency. The move involves the elevation of additional judges to permanent status, the reappointment of others for an extended term, and the elevation of a judicial officer to the bench.

The Constitutional Machinery of Judicial Appointments

The appointments highlight the intricate constitutional process governing the judiciary. Under the Constitution of India, High Court judges are appointed by the President. Article 217(1) provides for the appointment of permanent judges, who hold office until the age of 62. The process involves consultation with the Chief Justice of India (CJI), the Governor of the State, and the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court.

In practice, this constitutional mandate has evolved into the Collegium system, a convention established through a series of Supreme Court judgments (notably the Second and Third Judges Cases ). For High Court appointments, the Supreme Court Collegium, comprising the CJI and the two senior-most judges of the Supreme Court, makes the final recommendation after considering input from the respective High Court Collegium.

Separately, Article 224(1) allows the President to appoint "additional judges" for a temporary period not exceeding two years. This provision is typically invoked to manage a temporary increase in court business or to clear arrears of cases. These additional judges can later be elevated to permanent status under Article 217(1), as seen in many of the recent notifications.

Detailed Breakdown of the Appointments

The recent notifications cover a wide swathe of the country's judicial landscape:

• Andhra Pradesh High Court: Four additional judges—Justice Harinath Nunepally, Justice Kiranmayee Mandava (also known as Kiranmayee Kanaparthy), Justice Sumathi Jagadam, and Justice Nyapathy Vijay—have been made permanent. This move provides stability to the bench and reinforces its strength.

• Calcutta High Court: A dual notification saw two additional judges, Justice Partha Sarathi Sen and Justice Apurba Sinha Ray, appointed as permanent judges. Concurrently, seven other additional judges received a one-year extension effective August 31, 2025: Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury, Justice Prasenjit Biswas, Justice Uday Kumar, Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta, Justice Supratim Bhattacharya, Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, and Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi. This hybrid approach ensures continuity while permanently bolstering the court's ranks.

• Delhi High Court: In the national capital, Judicial Officer Vimal Kumar Yadav has been elevated as a Judge of the High Court. The elevation of experienced officers from the subordinate judiciary is a crucial channel for bringing practical, ground-level adjudicative experience to the High Court bench.

• Karnataka and Chhattisgarh High Courts: The confirmations were rounded out with Justice Gurusiddaiah Basavaraja being made a permanent judge in the Karnataka High Court and Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal being appointed as a permanent judge in the Chhattisgarh High Court, both having previously served as additional judges.

---

A "Symbol of Hope": CJI Gavai Inaugurates New Itanagar Bench Building

In a parallel development underscoring the focus on judicial infrastructure, Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai inaugurated the new building for the Gauhati High Court’s Itanagar Permanent Bench. The ceremony was attended by a host of dignitaries, including Union Ministers Kiren Rijiju and Arjun Ram Meghwal, and Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu.

CJI Gavai described the inauguration as a "historic step" towards making justice more accessible and affordable, advocating for the decentralization of judicial services to bring justice to the people's doorsteps. He emphasized that the judiciary, legislature, and executive are meant to serve all citizens, not just a privileged few.

The state-of-the-art facility, constructed at a cost of nearly ₹250 crore, is a significant infrastructural leap for the state. Chief Minister Pema Khandu called the occasion a "momentous day in the judicial history of Arunachal Pradesh and India," emphasizing that the new building is not just a physical structure but a “symbol of hope, accessibility, and unwavering pursuit of justice.”

Khandu highlighted the state's remarkable progress in expanding its judicial framework, noting a jump from just two courts in 2016 to 33 functional courts today. This expansion, supported by the creation of 463 new posts in the District Judiciary, demonstrates a concerted effort to strengthen the rule of law from the grassroots to the High Court level.

Legal Implications and the Road Ahead

The appointments and infrastructural development carry significant legal and institutional implications:

1. Addressing Vacancies and Pendency: High Court vacancies have been a persistent challenge, directly impacting case disposal rates. As one of the news sources notes, "These appointments come at a time when several High Courts across India are functioning with vacancies exceeding 25%, affecting case disposal rates." Filling these posts is a critical first step in tackling the judicial backlog and enhancing the efficiency of the justice delivery system.

2. Strengthening Supervisory Jurisdiction: High Courts, under Articles 227 (superintendence) and 235 (control), are responsible for the administration of the entire subordinate judiciary within their state. A full-strength bench is better equipped to perform this crucial supervisory role, ensuring that district and lower courts function effectively and maintain judicial discipline.

3. Reinforcing Access to Justice: The new Itanagar bench is a tangible manifestation of the principle of access to justice. For a geographically challenging state like Arunachal Pradesh, a modern and accessible High Court bench reduces the time, cost, and hardship for litigants and lawyers. This aligns with the constitutional promise embedded in Articles 32 and 226, which empower citizens to seek redress for rights violations.

4. The Collegium System in Action: These appointments demonstrate the continued operation of the Collegium system, which remains the established mechanism for judicial selection despite ongoing debates about its transparency and accountability, as highlighted in the NJAC Case (2015) . The swift processing of recommendations signals functional coordination between the judiciary and the executive.

While these developments are a positive step, the broader challenges of judicial reform remain. Issues such as modernizing court processes through technology, ensuring diversity on the bench, and maintaining a transparent and timely appointment pipeline are ongoing priorities. As Chief Minister Khandu urged, the path forward requires collaboration: "Let us work together - executive, judiciary, and the people - to build a justice system that reflects our highest constitutional ideals."