Judicial Appointments
Subject : Law & The Judiciary - Judicial Administration
Centre Greenlights Over 40 High Court Judicial Appointments in Major Push to Fill Vacancies
New Delhi – In one of the most significant recent moves to address judicial vacancies, the Central Government has notified the appointment and confirmation of over 40 judges across several High Courts. The appointments, which follow recommendations from the Supreme Court Collegium, aim to bolster the bench strength in key states, including a massive intake of 24 new judges for the Allahabad High Court.
The slew of notifications, announced by Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal, covers fresh appointments from both the Bar and subordinate judiciary, as well as the confirmation of several Additional Judges to permanent positions. This move is seen as a critical step towards mitigating the persistent issue of judicial vacancies that have strained the justice delivery system nationwide. As one source noted, "These appointments come at a time when several High Courts across India are functioning with vacancies exceeding 25%, affecting case disposal rates."
The most substantial of the appointments is directed at the Allahabad High Court, the country's largest, which has long grappled with a significant shortfall in judges. The Centre cleared the appointment of 24 new judges, bringing a much-needed reinforcement to a court with a sanctioned strength of 160 but which was functioning with nearly half that number. As of September 1, the court had an actual strength of only 84 judges.
The appointments comprise ten advocates and fourteen judicial officers, a blend intended to bring diverse experience to the bench.
Elevated from the Bar: * Vivek Saran * Vivek Kumar Singh * Garima Prashad * Sudhanshu Chauhan * Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary * Swarupama Chaturvedi * Siddharth Nandan * Kunal Ravi Singh * Indrajeet Shukla * Satya Veer Singh
Elevated from the Judicial Service: * Dr. Ajay Kumar-II * Chawan Prakash * Divesh Chandra Samant * Prashant Mishra-I * Tarun Saxena * Rajeev Bharti * Padam Narain Mishra * Lakshmi Kant Shukla * Jai Prakash Tiwari * Devendra Singh-I * Sanjiv Kumar * Vani Ranjan Agrawal * Achal Sachdev * Babita Rani
Notably, the government has withheld a decision on two other advocates, Adnan Ahmad and Jai Krishna Upadhyay, who were also part of the Collegium's recommendation. This selective approval underscores the executive's final say in the appointment process and occasionally becomes a point of contention within the memorandum of procedure.
The judicial appointments extend across the country, addressing vacancies and solidifying the bench in at least seven other High Courts.
Himachal Pradesh High Court: The court, which was "currently functioning with only 11 judges as against the strength of 17," will receive two new judges from the Bar: * Jiya Lal Bhardwaj * Romesh Verma
Karnataka High Court: Three judicial officers have been elevated as judges of the High Court following a Collegium recommendation from September 15: * Geetha Kadaba Bharatharaja Setty * Muralidhara Pai Borkatte * Tyagaraja Narayan Inavally
Additionally, Justice Gurusiddaiah Basavaraja, who was serving as an Additional Judge, has been confirmed as a permanent Judge, further strengthening the bench.
Calcutta High Court: Two Additional Judges, Justice Partha Sarathi Sen and Justice Apurba Sinha Ray, have been appointed as permanent Judges. In a separate notification, seven other Additional Judges received a one-year extension to their terms: * Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury * Justice Prasenjit Biswas * Justice Uday Kumar * Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta * Justice Supratim Bhattacharya * Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee * Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi
Delhi High Court: Judicial Officer Vimal Kumar Yadav has been elevated to the bench of the Delhi High Court, an appointment aimed at enhancing judicial capacity in the nation's capital.
Andhra Pradesh High Court: Four Additional Judges have been made permanent under Article 217(1) of the Constitution: * Justice Harinath Nunepally * Justice Kiranmayee Mandava * Justice Sumathi Jagadam * Justice Nyapathy Vijay
Chhattisgarh High Court: Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, serving as an Additional Judge, has been appointed as a permanent Judge of the court.
Analysis: Addressing the Pendency Crisis Through Personnel
This large-scale infusion of judicial personnel is a direct response to the escalating crisis of case pendency plaguing the Indian legal system. The Allahabad High Court, for example, has one of the highest backlogs in the country, and the addition of 24 judges is expected to significantly impact its disposal rate. The appointments are made by the President of India under Articles 217(1) (Permanent Judges) and 224(1) (Additional Judges) of the Constitution, finalizing a long procedural journey that begins with the High Court Collegium and moves through the state and central governments before culminating in the Supreme Court Collegium's recommendation.
While the appointments are a welcome development, the withholding of two names for the Allahabad High Court serves as a reminder of the underlying complexities of the Collegium system. The dynamic between the judiciary's recommendations and the executive's "due diligence" process can lead to delays or disagreements, impacting the timely filling of vacancies.
For the legal fraternity, these appointments signal a shift in courtroom dynamics. Lawyers practicing in these jurisdictions will now appear before new benches, and the elevation of colleagues from the Bar is often seen as a morale booster. The inclusion of judges from the subordinate judiciary brings crucial trial court experience to the appellate level, enriching the deliberative process.
Ultimately, the efficacy of these appointments will be measured by their impact on the administration of justice. The legal community will be watching closely to see if this significant enhancement of judicial strength translates into a tangible reduction in case backlogs and a more efficient and accessible justice system for all.
#JudicialAppointments #HighCourt #IndianJudiciary
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
CJI Declares Sikkim India's First Paperless Judiciary
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.