Case Law
Subject : Constitutional Law - Public Interest Litigation
BILASPUR: Taking suo moto cognizance of media reports highlighting severe deficiencies in state-run hospitals, the Chhattisgarh High Court has directed the state government to take immediate and comprehensive steps to improve medical facilities. The Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Bibhu Datta Guru, observed that the state's efforts, while acknowledged, appear "too short" to handle the immense patient load and address systemic issues like doctor vacancies and reagent shortages.
The court has ordered the Secretary of the Department of Health & Family Welfare to file a detailed affidavit on the measures being taken, with a specific focus on the alarming issue of "unhygienic/rusted surgical blades" allegedly being supplied across the state.
The High Court initiated this Public Interest Litigation (PIL) based on news articles published in 'Haribhoomi'. The reports painted a grim picture of two major government hospitals:
In response to the court's earlier order, the Secretary of the Health Department filed personal affidavits attempting to rebut the media reports and outline the existing facilities.
For CHC Belha: * The government vehemently denied the claim about the non-functional X-ray machine, calling it "absolutely fake news." It submitted data showing 426 X-rays were conducted in July 2025 alone. * However, the affidavit conceded significant staff shortages, admitting that 6 out of 9 specialist doctor posts and 3 postgraduate medical officer posts were vacant. * It was also admitted that due to a vacant anesthetist post, "emergency and night operations are not possible," though planned surgeries are conducted. * To tackle absenteeism, the state mentioned the introduction of an Aadhaar-based attendance system, set to be operational from August 15, 2025.
For Dr. Ambedkar Hospital, Raipur: * The affidavit highlighted the massive patient volume, with 52,278 patients treated in July 2025. * The state argued that an efficient registration system with multiple counters was in place and denied any unusual delays, asserting that no formal complaints had been received.
After reviewing the affidavits, the bench noted several inconsistencies and shortcomings. The court's order highlighted key areas of concern:
"From perusal of above affidavits it is manifest that though it is stated there are sufficient Doctors, but some posts are lying vacant and further there appears to be over crowding of the patients in the hospitals. The Reagents are also being not supplied, because of which, the tests could not be performed."
The bench found the state's efforts insufficient and pointed out that the affidavits completely failed to address the grave issue of unhygienic and rusted surgical blades.
Issuing a series of directives, the court ordered: 1. The Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, must file a detailed affidavit outlining concrete steps taken to improve facilities and specifically address the supply of unhygienic surgical blades. 2. Respondent No. 8, the Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation (CGMS), was directed to ensure the supply of requisite medical kits to all state hospitals to provide better patient care and file an affidavit on the steps taken.
The matter has been scheduled for its next hearing on September 17, 2025, when the state government and CGMS will be expected to report on their compliance with the court's orders.
#PublicHealth #PIL #ChhattisgarhHighCourt
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.