Judicial Reforms and Policy
Subject : Judiciary and Governance - Legal Aid and Access to Justice
New Delhi – In a powerful valedictory address just two weeks before demitting office, Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai delivered a profound message to the nation's judicial officers, urging a fundamental shift in mindset from judicial detachment to empathetic community engagement when serving in legal services. Speaking at the conclusion of a two-day national conference organized by the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), the Chief Justice also raised a critical concern regarding the persistent delays in payments to legal aid lawyers and paralegals, stressing that timely remuneration is a matter of dignity, not administrative convenience.
The conference, titled “Strengthening Legal Aid Delivery Mechanisms,” brought together key figures from the judiciary to deliberate on improving access to justice. It also saw the launch of new technological platforms, including the Legal Aid Defence System (LADS) Dashboard, aimed at enhancing transparency and efficiency within the legal aid framework.
CJI Gavai, in his capacity as Patron-in-Chief of NALSA, directly addressed judicial officers deputed to Legal Services Institutions, challenging the conventional wisdom of their training. He articulated a clear distinction between the roles of a judge on the bench and a facilitator in the community.
“Judicial training often teaches us to maintain a certain distance, to weigh evidence dispassionately, and to apply reasoned judgment," CJI Gavai stated. "But the work of legal aid demands the opposite sensibility: It requires empathy, collaboration, and the ability to see beyond procedure into the conditions that produce injustice.”
He emphasised that officers in these roles must shed the mantle of adjudicators and instead embrace the spirit of service and partnership. “In this role, we do not speak from the Bench. We speak as part of the community,” he asserted. “We must learn to listen before we act, to facilitate rather than to direct, and to see ourselves not as authority figures but as partners in the shared mission of delivering justice to those who have long been excluded from its reach.”
This call for humility and collaboration, he argued, is essential for the legal services movement to truly reflect the "humane face of the judiciary."
Pivoting to a crucial operational issue, CJI Gavai expressed deep concern over the "deeply demoralising effect" of delayed payments on panel lawyers and paralegal volunteers. He framed the issue not as a charity, but as a professional and moral obligation of the system.
“Just as officers and staff in regular service receive their salaries on time, so too should our volunteers and legal aid counsel be treated with the same dignity and respect,” the Chief Justice declared. He underscored that these dedicated individuals are the backbone of the legal aid system, and their timely compensation is a direct reflection of the value placed on their vital contribution.
Recalling his own tenure as Chairperson of the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee, he revealed the extent of the problem, noting that payments had once been pending for years. "When I was chairing the Committee, the payments were not made for years together, and therefore we had to prepare a system where payments were routinely and regularly credited directly to the account of the counsels," he shared.
To address this systemic lapse, CJI Gavai advocated for the creation of a centralised NALSA database to track volunteer details, payment status, and performance metrics, ensuring uniformity and accountability across the country.
Beyond financial matters, CJI Gavai highlighted the need for a robust institutional support system for legal aid providers. He called for a structured framework for continuous capacity building, including training in digital literacy, awareness of victims' rights, and effective communication skills.
Recognising the immense emotional toll on those working with marginalised communities, in prisons, and with victims of violence, he also made a compelling case for psychological support. “Empathy and emotional resilience must be cultivated as consciously as legal expertise,” he remarked, advocating for the establishment of counselling services and peer support networks to help legal aid professionals cope with the vicarious trauma inherent in their work.
Echoing the forward-looking theme, Justice Surya Kant, CJI-designate and Executive Chairman of NALSA, celebrated the institution's transformative journey and its expanded presence in the remotest corners of India. However, he cautioned against complacency, outlining a vision for the future focused on substantive change.
“NALSA's future lies not merely in expanding its reach, but in deepening its impact—through innovation, technology, and empathetic association,” Justice Surya Kant stated.
He praised the Legal Aid Defence Counsel System (LADCS) as a pivotal "shift from individualised and often fragmented representation to a structured and accountable system of defence." He also paid tribute to the crucial roles of Panel Lawyers and Para Legal Volunteers (PLVs), whom he described as the "operational pillars of this vast enterprise" and the "face of justice in villages, towns, and cities across the country."
Justice Surya Kant's remarks underscored the conference's core themes: the necessity of institutional strength, sustainable financial foundations, and an unwavering focus on the human capital that drives the legal aid movement.
As the judiciary prepares for a leadership transition, the clear and convergent messages from both the outgoing and incoming Chief Justices signal a resolute commitment to not only expanding the infrastructure of legal aid but, more importantly, to embedding the principles of empathy, dignity, and accountability into its very soul.
#LegalAid #AccessToJustice #NALSA
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.