Court Cannot Direct A Beggar To Pay Maintenance U/S 125 CrPC To His Wife: Kerala High Court - 2025-09-15

Law Updates Made Simple.

Kerala High Court Upholds Denial of Maintenance from Beggar Husband, Calls for State Intervention and Counselling

Ernakulam, Kerala: The High Court of Kerala has confirmed a Family Court order, ruling that a court cannot compel a man who survives by begging to pay maintenance to his wife under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.). While upholding the legal tenet, the court went beyond the immediate dispute, directing the State's Social Welfare Department to intervene, provide counselling to the husband against polygamy, and protect the destitute wives involved.

Case Background

The case, Jubairiya vs. Saidalavi N. , involved a revision petition filed by Jubairiya after the Family Court, Malappuram, rejected her claim for maintenance. She sought ₹10,000 per month from her husband, Saidalavi, a blind man whom she stated earns approximately ₹25,000 monthly, primarily through begging outside a mosque on Fridays and by assisting others with utility bill payments.

Jubairiya, Saidalavi's second wife, alleged cruelty and claimed he was threatening to divorce her and marry a third time, despite his first wife still being alive. Saidalavi admitted he was blind and survived on income from begging and the charity of neighbors but did not participate further in the Family Court proceedings, which were decided ex-parte.

Court's Legal Reasoning

The High Court affirmed the Family Court's core finding, stating, "no court can direct a beggar to pay maintenance to his wife when the wife admits that her husband is a beggar." The judgment noted that the petitioner, Jubairiya, was aware of her husband's condition and lack of income when she married him.

The court also expressed skepticism regarding the petitioner's claims of physical assault:

"How a blind man can assault a wife who is not blind is thought-provoking... a blind man assaulting a lady who is not blind will not usually happen unless she surrenders to the assault of the blind man. Therefore, I am not able to accept the contention of the petitioner that she was assaulted by the respondent."

Broader Social Commentary and Directions

Despite dismissing the wife's claim for maintenance, the court took judicial notice of the unique and distressing circumstances of the case, asserting, "Courts are not Robots. Human beings sit in courts as judges. The court cannot shut its eyes to the facts in this case."

The judgment strongly criticized the respondent's polygamous marriages, especially given his financial incapacity:

"I am of the considered opinion that his successive marriage, when he was only a beggar, cannot be accepted at all, even as per the customary law of Muslims... A person who has no capacity to maintain a second or third wife cannot marry again, even as per the customary law of Muslims."

The court highlighted a common misconception about Muslim personal law, quoting verses from the Quran (Chapter 4, verses 3 and 129) to emphasize that monogamy is the norm and polygamy is a conditional exception requiring absolute justice between wives—a condition the respondent could not possibly meet.

Final Decision and Implications

While confirming the Family Court's order denying maintenance, the High Court disposed of the petition with significant directions. It ordered the court registry to forward a copy of the judgment to the Secretary of the Social Welfare Department, State of Kerala, for necessary action.

The court mandated that the government must:

1. Provide appropriate counselling to the respondent, with the help of religious leaders, to educate him on the principles of Muslim law and deter him from further marriages.

2. Take steps to protect the petitioner and the respondent's first wife, ensuring they are provided with basic necessities like food and clothing.

3. Address the issue of the respondent's begging, as it is the State's duty to ensure no citizen is forced to beg for a livelihood.

This judgment, while legally straightforward on the issue of maintenance from a beggar, stands out for its compassionate judicial activism, transforming a personal dispute into a matter of state responsibility for social welfare and the protection of vulnerable women.