judgement
Subject : Civil Law - Property Law
The case involves a partnership firm that owns a property in Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu, and a dispute with the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) over the operation of a petrol bunk on the premises. In 1996, the partnership firm had entered into a 25-year lease agreement with BPCL, which was set to expire on July 31, 2022.
When the lease term ended, the partnership firm was unwilling to renew the agreement and sought the surrender of the premises. However, BPCL refused to vacate the property. The partnership firm then approached the authorities to cancel the necessary licenses and certificates, which were eventually revoked. BPCL filed a civil suit seeking to declare the cancellation of the No Objection Certificate as null and void, but the suit was rendered infructuous by the court's order.
The court examined the various judgments cited by the parties and found that the conduct of BPCL, a public sector undertaking, in continuing to occupy the property without paying rent after the expiration of the lease was unbecoming of a statutory corporation. The court noted that BPCL's behavior was similar to the conduct observed by the Supreme Court in a previous case involving the same respondent.
The court ordered BPCL to vacate the premises within two months and pay the arrears of market rent from August 1, 2022, until the date of handing over possession, along with interest at 12% per annum and a cost of ₹1,00,000. The court emphasized that public sector undertakings are not above the law and must comply with the rule of law.
#PetroleumLaw #PropertyDispute #LandlordTenant
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.