Back
Next 
judgement
2024-06-21
Subject: Civil Law - Property Law
The case involves a partnership firm that owns a property in Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu, and a dispute with the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) over the operation of a petrol bunk on the premises. In 1996, the partnership firm had entered into a 25-year lease agreement with BPCL, which was set to expire on July 31, 2022.
When the lease term ended, the partnership firm was unwilling to renew the agreement and sought the surrender of the premises. However, BPCL refused to vacate the property. The partnership firm then approached the authorities to cancel the necessary licenses and certificates, which were eventually revoked. BPCL filed a civil suit seeking to declare the cancellation of the No Objection Certificate as null and void, but the suit was rendered infructuous by the court's order.
The court examined the various judgments cited by the parties and found that the conduct of BPCL, a public sector undertaking, in continuing to occupy the property without paying rent after the expiration of the lease was unbecoming of a statutory corporation. The court noted that BPCL's behavior was similar to the conduct observed by the Supreme Court in a previous case involving the same respondent.
The court ordered BPCL to vacate the premises within two months and pay the arrears of market rent from August 1, 2022, until the date of handing over possession, along with interest at 12% per annum and a cost of ₹1,00,000. The court emphasized that public sector undertakings are not above the law and must comply with the rule of law.
Mechanical Issuance of LOCs in Section 498A BNS Cases Illegal Without Evasion or Grave Offence: Andhra Pradesh HC
17 Feb 2026
Mere Possession Of Bank's Stationery Without Proof Of Prejudice Not Misconduct: Calcutta High Court
17 Feb 2026
Contradictory Testimonies of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration Warrant Acquittal Under Sections 147, 304 Part-I/149 IPC: Calcutta High Court
17 Feb 2026
Absconding Accused Not Entitled To Anticipatory Bail On Co-Accused Acquittal Alone: Supreme Court
17 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Seeks Affidavit on TET for Secondary Special Educators
17 Feb 2026
Unproven Accusations of Wife's Extramarital Affair Amount to Mental Cruelty, Justifying Separation: Karnataka HC Denies Divorce on Desertion
17 Feb 2026
Flight Risk and Economic Interests Justify LOC Even Pre-Prosecution in Corporate Fraud: Calcutta High Court
17 Feb 2026
Only Enrolled Advocates Can Practice Before Tribunals: BCI and Tax Lawyers Argue in Delhi High Court
17 Feb 2026
Delhi HC Directs Joint Meeting Between DCGI & Legal Metrology on Mandatory Veg/Non-Veg Dots for Cosmetics: Rule 6(8) Legal Metrology Rules
17 Feb 2026
The court established that a writ petition for eviction is maintainable when the facts are straightforward, and public sector undertakings are not above the law regarding lease agreements.
The court affirmed that mere acceptance of rent does not imply lease renewal, allowing eviction under Article 226 when the lease has expired without mutual agreement for renewal.
The court affirmed its jurisdiction to vacate leased premises upon expiration of the lease period, reinforcing the enforceability of lease agreements under the Constitution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
