judgement
Subject : - Contract Law
In this case, the plaintiffs entered into a sale agreement with the defendants to purchase a property. The plaintiffs paid a substantial amount as advance, but the defendants later refused to execute the sale deed. The plaintiffs filed a suit seeking specific performance of the agreement, as well as an alternate relief of return of the advance payment.
The plaintiffs argued that they had paid a total of ₹16 lakh as advance and were ready and willing to perform their part of the agreement. They claimed that the defendants were trying to sell the property to a third party at a higher price, despite the existing agreement with the plaintiffs.
The defendants, on the other hand, denied receiving the full advance payment and claimed that the plaintiffs had failed to pay the balance sale consideration within the stipulated time, thereby breaching the agreement. They also argued that the suit was barred by limitation and under Order II Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The court found that the plaintiffs had only proved the payment of ₹15 lakh as advance and not the additional ₹1 lakh they had claimed. The court also held that the time was essence of the contract and the plaintiffs had failed to prove their readiness and willingness to perform their part of the agreement within the stipulated time.
However, the court recognized that the plaintiffs were entitled to the alternate relief of refund of the advance payment of ₹15 lakh, along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of the decree, and post-decree interest at the rate of 6% per annum until the date of realization.
The court partially allowed the appeal, confirming the trial court's decision to deny the relief of specific performance, but setting aside the trial court's decision on the alternate relief. The court directed the defendants to pay the plaintiffs the refund of ₹15 lakh, along with the specified interest amounts.
#SpecificPerformance #ContractLaw #RealEstate
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Pune Law Students Challenge Discriminatory Exam Bar in Bombay HC
01 May 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Wife Can't Seek Husband's Income Tax Details via RTI for Maintenance Claims: Delhi High Court
01 May 2026
Political Rivalry Doesn't Warrant Custodial Arrest in Forgery Case: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Citing Article 21
01 May 2026
Karnataka HC Closes FIR Proceedings Against Actor for Religious Mimicry After Apology, Directs Temple Visit: Sections 196, 299, 302 BNS
01 May 2026
Interim Bail Extended Till May 25 or Judgment Delivery in Rape Conviction Appeal: Rajasthan High Court
01 May 2026
MP High Court Orders Grievance Committees to Entertain Discrimination Complaints from All Students Including General Category Pending Reply
01 May 2026
Unfounded Scandalous Allegations Against Judicial Officers Impermissible in Pleadings: J&K & Ladakh High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.