judgement
Subject : Administrative Law - Public Employment
Description :
In a significant judgment, the court has quashed the appointment process for the position of Special Survey Assistant Settlement Officer in the state of Bihar. The case was brought forward by a group of petitioners who were aggrieved by the selection process and the final results.
The petitioners argued that the appointing authority had changed the rules of the game during the selection process, which was in violation of the principles of natural justice. They contended that the requirement to submit specific documents for consideration of work experience was not followed consistently, and that the final selection of candidates was arbitrary and discriminatory.
The court found that the appointing authority had indeed changed the rules of the selection process midway, which was not permissible. The court noted that the advertisement and subsequent notifications clearly stated that candidates would be awarded 5 marks for each year of work experience, up to a maximum of 20 marks. However, the authority had later decided to award 20 marks to all candidates, regardless of their actual work experience.
The court held that this decision was unjust and arbitrary, as it deprived the candidates of the rightful weightage for their prior work experience. The court emphasized that the principles of natural justice, as enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution, must be upheld in such selection processes.
The court quashed the final selection list and directed the appointing authority to reconsider the selection process, taking into account the actual work experience of each candidate and awarding them the appropriate marks accordingly. The court also stated that the petitioners should be appointed to the vacant positions, without disturbing the selection of candidates who have already been appointed, if they are found to be eligible after the reconsideration.
The court's decision underscores the importance of adhering to the principles of fairness and transparency in public employment selection processes, and serves as a reminder to the authorities to ensure that the rules of the game are not changed midway, to the detriment of the candidates.
#LegalNews #PublicService #FairSelection #PatnaHighCourt
Supreme Court Rules Criminal Courts Must Not Act As Recovery Agents For Disputed Dues
27 Jul 2026
Rajya Sabha Bill Seeks To Criminalize Vande Mataram Disruption Under The National Honour Act
27 Jul 2026
Will Competitive Exams Deplete Delhi District Courts of Judges During Crucial Trial Proceedings This Year?
27 Jul 2026
Bombay High Court Adjourns Defamation Case Involving Union Minister Nitin Gadkari And Online Media Platforms
28 Jul 2026
Rajasthan High Court Directs State to Form Separate Wings for Crime Investigation and Security
28 Jul 2026
Gujarat High Court Upholds Constitutionality Of CGST Section 16 2 c Denying Unpaid Input Tax
28 Jul 2026
Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues New Guidelines For Legal Aid Defense Counsel System
28 Jul 2026
Government Introduces Public Examinations Amendment Bill 2026 In Lok Sabha To Curb Exam Paper Leaks
28 Jul 2026
Should Delhi High Court Increase Pecuniary Jurisdiction of District Courts to ₹10 Crore Threshold?
28 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.