Case Law
Subject : Constitutional Law - Writ Petition
Chennai:
The Madras High Court has dismissed a petition by the Tamil Nadu government seeking to modify a previous order that prohibited the demolition and construction of new buildings at the Government
The judgment, delivered by Justice
B.Pugalendhi
, arises from a modification petition filed by the state government against an earlier order dated December 15, 2020, in WP(MD)No.5149 of 2019. The 2020 order had restrained the government from demolishing existing structures and constructing new ones at the
Case Background: A College in Temporary Quarters
The Government
The court noted that the current campus area (4.91 acres main + 1.67 acres annex) falls short of the minimum 5 acres required for a
Concerns over lack of infrastructure date back to student agitations in 2004. Following this, the government mooted a proposal to establish a separate University for Indian Medicine and
Previous Litigation and Court Directives
A former student filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in 2014 (WP(MD)No.7582 of 2014) seeking the establishment of the proposed University. In 2016, a Division Bench, including Justice V. Ramasubramanian (as he then was), extensively discussed the historical significance and potential of indigenous medicine, citing examples of ancient surgical practices and modern applications like the RAN formulation for HIV/AIDS. The court directed the government to proceed with establishing the University as per the 2012 G.O., suggesting land at Chettikulam.
Despite this, the government attempted to renovate the existing
Government's Plea for Modification
The Additional Advocate General argued that the existing buildings are dilapidated and need demolition and renovation. Funds sanctioned earlier for infrastructure development (Rs. 5 Crore in 2012, additional Rs. 5 Crore in 2014, Rs. 1.7 Crore Centrally Sponsored Scheme) are lying idle due to the prohibition. The government contended that improving infrastructure at the existing college and establishing a separate University are distinct projects and one should not stall the other. They also highlighted recent steps towards establishing a
Court's Reasoning: Patronage, Space, and Location
Justice
Pugalendhi
, in the judgment, echoed the sentiments of the earlier bench regarding the lack of adequate patronage for indigenous medicine post-independence. The court noted the government's own admission in the 2014 PIL that the
The court questioned the rationale behind spending more money on a site that is inherently inadequate and was initially intended only as a temporary location. It highlighted that the Administrative Block is a heritage building and cannot be demolished anyway.
Key Excerpt from the Judgment:
"Any further spending of money in the existing place would not serve the purpose for which the College was established. This System of Medicine emerged from the Western Ghats and the space originally identified at
The court expressed concern that despite having a separate department since 1970 and a college since 1964, research in
Decision and Observations
While appreciating the government's initiative in bringing the Tamil Nadu
"We feel that the projects are often taken to Chennai for the convenience of the Administrators, rather than the requirements of the projects.
The court proposed establishing the college/university in its original location at
The court dismissed the modification petition, upholding the prohibition on renovation at the
#SiddhaMedicine #MadrasHighCourt #PIL #MadrasHighCourt
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.