Case Law
Subject : Constitutional Law - Writ Petition
Chennai:
The Madras High Court has dismissed a petition by the Tamil Nadu government seeking to modify a previous order that prohibited the demolition and construction of new buildings at the Government
The judgment, delivered by Justice
B.Pugalendhi
, arises from a modification petition filed by the state government against an earlier order dated December 15, 2020, in WP(MD)No.5149 of 2019. The 2020 order had restrained the government from demolishing existing structures and constructing new ones at the
Case Background: A College in Temporary Quarters
The Government
The court noted that the current campus area (4.91 acres main + 1.67 acres annex) falls short of the minimum 5 acres required for a
Concerns over lack of infrastructure date back to student agitations in 2004. Following this, the government mooted a proposal to establish a separate University for Indian Medicine and
Previous Litigation and Court Directives
A former student filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in 2014 (WP(MD)No.7582 of 2014) seeking the establishment of the proposed University. In 2016, a Division Bench, including Justice V. Ramasubramanian (as he then was), extensively discussed the historical significance and potential of indigenous medicine, citing examples of ancient surgical practices and modern applications like the RAN formulation for HIV/AIDS. The court directed the government to proceed with establishing the University as per the 2012 G.O., suggesting land at Chettikulam.
Despite this, the government attempted to renovate the existing
Government's Plea for Modification
The Additional Advocate General argued that the existing buildings are dilapidated and need demolition and renovation. Funds sanctioned earlier for infrastructure development (Rs. 5 Crore in 2012, additional Rs. 5 Crore in 2014, Rs. 1.7 Crore Centrally Sponsored Scheme) are lying idle due to the prohibition. The government contended that improving infrastructure at the existing college and establishing a separate University are distinct projects and one should not stall the other. They also highlighted recent steps towards establishing a
Court's Reasoning: Patronage, Space, and Location
Justice
Pugalendhi
, in the judgment, echoed the sentiments of the earlier bench regarding the lack of adequate patronage for indigenous medicine post-independence. The court noted the government's own admission in the 2014 PIL that the
The court questioned the rationale behind spending more money on a site that is inherently inadequate and was initially intended only as a temporary location. It highlighted that the Administrative Block is a heritage building and cannot be demolished anyway.
Key Excerpt from the Judgment:
"Any further spending of money in the existing place would not serve the purpose for which the College was established. This System of Medicine emerged from the Western Ghats and the space originally identified at
The court expressed concern that despite having a separate department since 1970 and a college since 1964, research in
Decision and Observations
While appreciating the government's initiative in bringing the Tamil Nadu
"We feel that the projects are often taken to Chennai for the convenience of the Administrators, rather than the requirements of the projects.
The court proposed establishing the college/university in its original location at
The court dismissed the modification petition, upholding the prohibition on renovation at the
#SiddhaMedicine #MadrasHighCourt #PIL #MadrasHighCourt
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Ex-Parte Order Without Notice or Jurisdiction Constitutes 'Gross Abuse of Process': Rajasthan High Court
15 Jun 2026
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Calcutta HC Questions Speaker’s Power to Appoint LoP
16 Jun 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.