Back
Next 
judgement
2024-06-25
Subject: Administrative Law - Customs and Excise
# Court Sets Aside Customs Confiscation Order, Grants Petitioner Opportunity to Respond
The case involves a dispute over the confiscation of 2,000 grams of gold from Mr.
The petitioner argued that they were not provided with sufficient opportunity to respond to the show-cause notice (Ext.P2) issued by the respondent. The petitioner claimed that they had sought adjournments (Exts.P3 and P4) to file a reply, but the respondent passed the confiscation order (Ext.P5) without considering these requests and without complying with the provisions of Section 122A of the Customs Act.
The court found merit in the petitioner's contentions, noting that the respondent had not referred to the petitioner's requests for adjournment in the confiscation order. The court emphasized that the principles of natural justice, as explicitly stated in Section 122A of the Customs Act, require the adjudicating authority to provide the party with an opportunity to be heard if the party so desires.
The court set aside the confiscation order (Ext.P5) and directed the petitioner to submit a reply to the show-cause notice (Ext.P2) within 10 days of receiving a copy of the judgment. The respondent was then ordered to hear the petitioner in person and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, within one month of receiving the petitioner's reply.
This judgment highlights the importance of adhering to the principles of natural justice and the procedural safeguards provided in the Customs Act when adjudicating matters related to the confiscation of goods.
Thane Court Rejects Application to Dismiss Defamation Suit Against Digvijaya Singh Over RSS Remarks: Order VII Rule 11 CPC
06 Feb 2026
Ministry Revises Fees for Central Government Counsel Effective 2026
06 Feb 2026
Temporary Re-Employment Not Entitling Ex-Serviceman to Civil Pension: Punjab & Haryana HC
06 Feb 2026
High Courts Confirm Only 10% of Death Sentences Since 2016
06 Feb 2026
Finality in IPS Cadre Allocation Cannot Be Reopened After Decades: Supreme Court
06 Feb 2026
Patna HC Quashes Cognizance Against Minister Sans Assault Allegations
06 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Directs Trial Courts to Inform Accused of Legal Aid Rights Before Witness Examination
07 Feb 2026
Law Ministry Reveals 73% Upper Caste Judges Since 2021
07 Feb 2026
Dwivedi: British Geopolitics Created Pakistan, Not Jinnah
07 Feb 2026
A party must exhaust available statutory remedies before seeking judicial review.
Procedural requirements under Customs Act must be adhered to, including filing appeals within stipulated time frames.
The discretion to grant an option to pay fine under Section 125 of the Customs Act is not mandatory and depends on the circumstances of each case, particularly when the goods exceed legal limits.
The burden of proof in confiscation cases lies with the respondent to establish non-smuggling as outlined in the Customs Act.
A writ petition challenges seizure under the Customs Act; the court maintains the petitioner's right to contest a final adjudication order.
The issuance of show cause notices regarding seized goods must adhere to the limitation period under the Customs Act, and proper procedures must be followed for disposal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
