Disruptive Behavior by Lawyers
Subject : Legal Ethics - Courtroom Conduct
Court Slams Lawyers for Disruptive Behavior During Oral Submissions
Justice Chang of the Canadian court has condemned the unprofessional behavior of lawyers who resort to facial expressions and snickering during opposing counsel's oral submissions. He emphasized that such conduct is neither new nor rare and is not a hallmark of an effective advocate.
The court noted that during a recent hearing, counsel for the applicant engaged in eye rolling, head shaking, grunting, snickering, guffawing, and loud muttering while the opposing counsel was presenting arguments. Despite an apology at the insistence of the judge, similar displays continued throughout the hearing.
Justice Chang stressed that rolling eyes, dancing eyebrows, and other mannerisms do not constitute proper critique or response to submissions. He urged lawyers to maintain decorum and respect for the court and opposing counsel.
This incident highlights the importance of professionalism and ethical conduct in legal proceedings. Lawyers have a duty to uphold the integrity of the court and to present their arguments in a respectful and dignified manner.
Disruptive behavior - Facial expressions - Snickering - Professionalism - Courtroom etiquette - Respect for the court - Legal ethics
#LegalEtiquette #ProfessionalismInCourt #RespectForTheCourt
Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Prevail Over Detention Period Claims: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
11 Mar 2026
Failure to Pay Compensation Vitiates Limitation Claims in Land Acquisition: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
04 Mar 2026
Discretionary Nature of Section 143-A NI Act: J&K&L High Court Upholds Interim Compensation Based on Accused's Conduct
12 Jun 2026
Salman Khan Files Delhi HC Plea Against 'Kala Hiran'
12 Jun 2026
Writ Court Cannot Exercise Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief After Directing Litigant to Civil Forum: MP High Court
12 Jun 2026
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.