judgement
2024-07-17
Subject: Criminal Law - Assault and Battery
The case involved an incident where the elder brother of the complainant was allegedly assaulted by the appellant and another accused, resulting in the victim's death. The appellant was charged under Sections 341, 325, 326, 307, and 304 of the Indian Penal Code.
The defense argued that the allegations made by the complainant and the eyewitnesses were false and that the incident was a mere result of the mental anguish of the complainant over the loss of his brother. The defense also claimed that the eyewitnesses were interested parties and their testimonies should not be relied upon.
The court carefully examined the evidence presented by the prosecution, including the testimonies of the eyewitnesses (PW-1, PW-7, and PW-9) and the medical evidence. The court found that the eyewitnesses' testimonies were consistent and corroborated by the medical evidence, which showed that the victim had sustained severe injuries, including a depressed comminuted fracture of the skull.
The court rejected the defense's argument that the eyewitnesses were interested parties, citing the well-established legal principle that the mere fact of a witness being a relative of the victim does not make them an "interested" witness. The court emphasized that a close relative would be the last person to shield the real culprit and falsely implicate an innocent person.
The court upheld the conviction of the appellant, finding that the prosecution had successfully established its case through the reliable and trustworthy testimony of the eyewitnesses, which was further corroborated by the medical evidence. The court sentenced the appellant to rigorous imprisonment for six years and a fine of Rs. 1,000 for the offense under Section 304 Part-II of the Indian Penal Code.
#CriminalLaw #EyewitnessTestimony #InterestedWitnesses #CalcuttaHighCourt
Law Ministry Reveals 73% Upper Caste Judges Since 2021
07 Feb 2026
Delhi High Court Extends Personality Rights to Everyone
07 Feb 2026
Uttarakhand HC Quashes Judge's Dismissal for Flawed Inquiry Lacking Natural Justice
07 Feb 2026
Dwivedi: British Geopolitics Created Pakistan, Not Jinnah
07 Feb 2026
Court Remands Influencer Adhikary to 10-Day Custody in Rape Case
07 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Issues Notice on Repugnancy of Kerala Joint Family Act to 2005 Succession Amendment
07 Feb 2026
Delhi HC Upholds Termination of Probationary Judge as Simpliciter for Unsuitability
07 Feb 2026
Toilet Facilities Are Basic Human Rights Under Article 21: Bombay HC
07 Feb 2026
MP High Court Quashes FIR Under Repealed Foreigners Act
07 Feb 2026
Eyewitness testimony from relatives is admissible and credible if consistent and corroborated by medical evidence, regardless of their relationship to the victim.
Evidentiary value of eyewitness testimony can support a conviction even if the witness is related to the victim, provided the testimony is credible and corroborated by additional evidence.
The court modified murder convictions under Section 302/149 to Section 304 Part-II/149 based on medical evidence attributing death to septicaemia from ante mortem injuries, highlighting the significa....
The credibility of witness testimonies in criminal trials requires careful scrutiny, particularly when they are related to victims, and the prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Murder – Incarceration of accused for long sixteen years without credible evidence is a shocking state of affairs.
The court established that the testimony of close relatives can be deemed credible and sufficient for conviction if it is consistent and corroborated by medical evidence, and that the burden of dispr....
(1) It is possible to form a common intention just before or during occurrence.
(2) When evidence of eyewitnesses is of sterling quality, adverse inference need not be drawn – Quality is more impo....
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.