Back
Next 
judgement
2024-06-28
Subject: Administrative Law - Public Procurement
The petitioner, a company, was disqualified from a tender due to an observation that it had suppressed the pendency of a criminal case against itself and its employees. The petitioner sought to have this observation expunged from the record, but did not challenge the disqualification itself.
The petitioner argued that in a previous similar tender, the court had found that the petitioner was not directly involved in the criminal case, as per a report from the Superintendent of Police. The petitioner contended that this should lead to the expungement of the observation in the current case.
The court acknowledged that in the previous case, it had merely recorded the submission of the Advocate General that a report was obtained from the Superintendent of Police, and had not made a finding that the petitioner was not involved in the criminal case. The court stated that if the petitioner has sufficient material to demonstrate its non-involvement, it can approach the authority that made the disqualification decision to have the observation expunged.
The court dismissed the writ petition, but granted the petitioner the liberty to approach the relevant authority to have the observation expunged, if it can provide sufficient evidence of its non-involvement in the criminal case.
The court's decision upholds the disqualification of the petitioner from the tender due to the suppression of information regarding the pending criminal case, but leaves the door open for the petitioner to potentially have the observation expunged if it can prove its innocence.
Mechanical Issuance of LOCs in Section 498A BNS Cases Illegal Without Evasion or Grave Offence: Andhra Pradesh HC
17 Feb 2026
Mere Possession Of Bank's Stationery Without Proof Of Prejudice Not Misconduct: Calcutta High Court
17 Feb 2026
Contradictory Testimonies of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration Warrant Acquittal Under Sections 147, 304 Part-I/149 IPC: Calcutta High Court
17 Feb 2026
Absconding Accused Not Entitled To Anticipatory Bail On Co-Accused Acquittal Alone: Supreme Court
17 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Seeks Affidavit on TET for Secondary Special Educators
17 Feb 2026
Unproven Accusations of Wife's Extramarital Affair Amount to Mental Cruelty, Justifying Separation: Karnataka HC Denies Divorce on Desertion
17 Feb 2026
Flight Risk and Economic Interests Justify LOC Even Pre-Prosecution in Corporate Fraud: Calcutta High Court
17 Feb 2026
Only Enrolled Advocates Can Practice Before Tribunals: BCI and Tax Lawyers Argue in Delhi High Court
17 Feb 2026
Delhi HC Directs Joint Meeting Between DCGI & Legal Metrology on Mandatory Veg/Non-Veg Dots for Cosmetics: Rule 6(8) Legal Metrology Rules
17 Feb 2026
Non-disclosure of a criminal case does not automatically disqualify a candidate; each case should be evaluated based on its specific circumstances and the candidate's overall suitability.
Point of Law : Suppression of information about pending criminal case in verification form is a sufficient ground for canceling the candidature or withholding appointment.
Suppression of criminal antecedents in application forms is a valid ground for disqualification, even if the criminal case is later quashed.
The cancellation of a candidate's application for non-disclosure of a minor offence requires a reasonable and objective assessment of all relevant factors, including the trivial nature of the crime a....
The employer's decision to cancel the petitioner's selection was not reasonable or objective and that it violated the principles of natural justice.
Appointment – Candidate is obliged to give correct information as to his conviction, acquittal or arrest or pendency of criminal case and there should be no suppression or false mention of required i....
Failure to disclose involvement in a criminal case at the time of police verification renders a candidate ineligible for the current selection process, but the candidate may be eligible for considera....
Suppression of material facts regarding pending criminal cases has a clear bearing on the character, conduct, and antecedents of the employee, and can lead to termination of services.
Non-disclosure of a trivial criminal case does not automatically disqualify a candidate for employment, especially if the case has been quashed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
