Back
Next 
judgement
2024-06-27
Subject: Family Law - Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens
# Court Upholds Maintenance Order for Elderly Father, Dismisses Daughter's Petition
The case involves a dispute over the maintenance of an elderly father, the 2nd respondent, by his children. The petitioner, the elder daughter of the 2nd respondent, challenged the order passed by the Maintenance Tribunal directing her to pay a monthly maintenance of ₹10,000 to her father.
The petitioner argued that the Tribunal's order was not in compliance with the , as it did not implead the other two children, respondents 3 and 4, as additional respondents. The petitioner claimed that she had been regularly making online and offline money transfers to her father, and that the other two children were also gainfully employed and should share the responsibility of maintaining their father.
The court noted that the 2nd respondent had stated in his complaint that his second daughter (the petitioner) was employed and could help him financially, while the other two children were not in a sound financial position to do so. The Tribunal had also found that the payments made by the petitioner were insufficient for the 2nd respondent's decent living and medical expenses.
The court held that the Tribunal's order was not illegal, as it had considered the facts of the case and the 2nd respondent's financial and medical needs. The court also noted that the Tribunal had directed the other two children to bear the medical expenses of the 2nd respondent and his wife and to provide other necessary assistance.
The court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition, upholding the Maintenance Tribunal's order directing the petitioner to pay a monthly maintenance of ₹10,000 to her elderly father, the 2nd respondent.
Family Judge Exposes Weaponized Litigation in Custody Dispute
14 Feb 2026
Centre Notifies Two High Court Chief Justice Appointments
16 Feb 2026
Deep Chandra Joshi Appointed Acting NCLT President
16 Feb 2026
Debunking the Myth That Indians Lack Privacy Concepts
16 Feb 2026
Whose View Is It Anyway? Juniors Uncredited
16 Feb 2026
Private Property Disputes Not Human Rights Violations; HRC Lacks Jurisdiction Under PHRA: Gujarat HC
16 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Rejects Stay on RTI Data Amendments
16 Feb 2026
DIFC Court: Strong Reasons Required to Block Arbitration
17 Feb 2026
Bar Leaders Oppose High Courts Saturday Sittings
17 Feb 2026
Children's obligation to maintain elderly parents under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 cannot be excused due to financial constraints or alternative living arran....
Law, religion and custom mandate sons to look after their parents and more particularly aged mother.
Law of marriage generally provides for restitution of conjugal rights qua the deserting spouse, is true.
Withdrawal of maintenance orders must consider previous court rulings and objections raised to ensure fairness.
Maintenance –Where senior citizen is not able to maintain himself or herself and children or relatives, as case may be, neglect or refuse to maintain them, Tribunal is empowered to order them to make....
The court affirmed the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction, focusing on whether tribunals overstepped legal boundaries, while also emphasizing the need to balance maintenance obligations between....
The executing court must execute final orders under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, without alteration.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
