2024-01-09
Subject:
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is
right in contending that the decision of this Court in
the case of State of M.P. v. Uday Singh1 will not apply in
this case, as the said decision is based on Section 52-C
What is applicable in the present case is Sections 49(4) and 49(6) of the Assam Forest Regulation, 1891 (as amended). Against an order of confiscation of vehicles and goods, there is an appeal under Section 49-C before the District Judge.
In this case, the petitioner preferred an appeal
before the District Judge. The contention of the
petitioner was that he, as the owner of the vehicle, was
not aware that the vehicle was being used for illegally
transporting the forest produce. The learned District
Judge has held that the petitioner failed to prove the
said contention. This finding has been affirmed by the
High Court by the impugned judgment. While affirming the
view taken by the District Judge, the High Court has
relied upon a decision of this Court in the case of State
of Karnataka v. K.Krishnan2 wherein this Court held that
when any vehicle is seized on the allegation that it was
used for committing a forest offence, the same shall not
be normally returned to a party till culmination of all
proceedings in respect of such offence. Only for
Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU)
AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
No Imminent Threat of Infringement Bars Ex-Parte Injunction in Trademark Suit: Belagavi Principal District Court
12 Feb 2026
Centre Justifies Wangchuk Detention as Ladakh Violence Halting Measure
12 Feb 2026
Court Rejects Selective Arbitration Under Section 21
12 Feb 2026
Family Judge Exposes Weaponized Litigation in Custody Dispute
14 Feb 2026
Centre Notifies Two High Court Chief Justice Appointments
16 Feb 2026
Deep Chandra Joshi Appointed Acting NCLT President
16 Feb 2026
Debunking the Myth That Indians Lack Privacy Concepts
16 Feb 2026
Whose View Is It Anyway? Juniors Uncredited
16 Feb 2026
Private Property Disputes Not Human Rights Violations; HRC Lacks Jurisdiction Under PHRA: Gujarat HC
16 Feb 2026
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.