Delhi High Court Rejects PFI Ex-Chief's Private Hospital Plea: AIIMS Deemed Sufficient, But Second Opinion Allowed

In a balanced ruling on March 27, 2026, the Delhi High Court dismissed former Popular Front of India (PFI) chairman E Abubacker's plea to shift from Tihar Jail to a private multi-specialty hospital like Indraprastha Apollo for treatment. Justice Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma emphasized that premier government facilities like AIIMS are adequately equipped, rejecting complaints of rude staff as insufficient grounds for transfer. However, recognizing Abubacker's serious health issues, the court permitted a one-time escorted visit to Apollo for a second opinion.

Abubacker, arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on September 22, 2022, in a UAPA case (NIA Case No. 2/2023, RC-14/2022/NIA/DLI), faces allegations of PFI's terror funding conspiracy and indoctrination camps—leading to the group's five-year ban. Despite prior bail denials, including by the Supreme Court in January 2025 after an AIIMS evaluation, his health woes persist.

Ailing Accused: From Cancer Survivor to Breathless in Custody

Abubacker, lodged in Tihar's CJ-08/09, suffers from a cascade of conditions: Type-II diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, hypertension, benign prostate hyperplasia, coronary artery disease, idiopathic Parkinson's disease, post-operative oesophagus carcinoma (2020), moderate frailty, and recent lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). Recent symptoms—persistent cough, breathlessness, weakness, fluctuating sugar and blood pressure—prompted multiple visits to DDU, Safdarjung, and AIIMS hospitals since early March 2026.

The timeline reveals repeated judicial scrutiny: Trial court ordered AIIMS admission in June 2023; Supreme Court mandated a medical board in November 2024 (SLP (Crl.) No. 13178/2024), leading to inpatient evaluation; a July 2025 trial court rejection of private treatment; and a November 2025 High Court nod for record-based second opinion, which private doctors (Apollo, Fortis) deemed inadequate without physical exam.

Petitioner's Cry: "Disastrous" Care and Humiliation at AIIMS

Abubacker's counsel painted a grim picture: "disastrous" AIIMS experiences with alleged humiliation—doctors suspecting feigned illness, rude ophthalmology waits, and non-cordial staff. They argued prior trial court (July 2025) and Supreme Court directives were undermined, insisting on self-funded private care, family attendant (son Thalal Hasoon), and no Delhi Armed Police interference. Apollo's opinion? Physical exam essential for meaningful input.

NIA's Stand: Premier Care Already in Place, No Negligence Shown

NIA's Special Public Prosecutor Rahul Tyagi countered that Abubacker receives top-tier treatment at AIIMS, Safdarjung, and others—regular referrals, emergency care, no evidence of negligence or ineffective lines. Staff behavior isn't a transfer trigger; a similar plea was dismissed earlier. Liberty for second opinion was already granted and used.

Judicial Scrutiny: Precedents Prioritize State Facilities

Justice Sharma aligned with the trial court's July 2025 order, which dismissed "hostile atmosphere" claims absent treatment lapses, opting instead to sensitize AIIMS staff. Echoing Supreme Court (January 2025) and prior High Court directives, the bench held AIIMS—a "premier medical institution"—fully capable. No precedents were freshly cited, but the ruling reinforces Article 21's right to life/health for prisoners, balanced against security in UAPA probes. PTI reports note PFI's ISIS links, underscoring case gravity.

AIIMS, being a premier medical institution of the country, is well-equipped to address his medical needs. As regards the petitioner’s grievance that the behaviour of certain medical personnel was not cordial, this Court is of the opinion that such a ground, in the absence of any material indicating deficiency in medical care, cannot justify a direction for shifting the petitioner to a private hospital.”

“This Court finds no merit in the said prayer. This is all the more so in the absence of any material on record to show any deficiency or inadequacy in the medical treatment being provided to the petitioner.”

“Even though the petitioner is an accused, he is suffering from multiple serious medical ailments and is entitled to appropriate medical evaluation.”

One Visit, No Shift: Court's Pragmatic Directives

The petition was disposed with clear orders: - Second Opinion Granted : Produce Abubacker next week at Apollo's Endocrinology/Neurology for exam; report to jail/AIIMS/family; son permitted as attendant. - Treatment Stays Public : Continues exclusively at AIIMS/government hospitals. - Family Access : Prompt emergency alerts; son attends hospitalizations. - No Merit on Core Plea : Private shift denied; no opinion on case merits.

This ensures health rights without compromising custody, potentially guiding future undertrial medical pleas—prioritizing evidence of care gaps over behavioral gripes. As other reports highlight, it follows February 2024's efficacy mandate for Tihar treatment.

The ruling (W.P.(CRL) 787/2026, Neutral Citation: 2026:DHC:2623) underscores judicial vigilance in prisoner welfare amid terror probes.