Delhi High Court Shields "Bachpan Ka Pyar" Hook Line from YouTube Pirate Playlists

The Delhi High Court has moved swiftly to shield the catchy refrain “jaane meri janeman bachpan ka pyar bhool nahi jaana re” from unauthorised exploitation, granting an ex-parte ad-interim injunction that bars several YouTube channels and unidentified infringers from using the hook line or distributing copies of the song “Bachpan Ka Pyar”.

From Gujarati Roots to 2026 Courtroom Drama

The musical journey began in 2017 when lyricist P.P. Baryia, composer Mayur Nadiya and singer Kamlesh Barot created the original Gujarati version. Rights were assigned to Meshwa Electronics, which uploaded the track on 12 May 2017. A Hindi adaptation featuring Badshah followed in 2021 after Meshwa granted a synchronisation licence to Universal Music Media India Pvt Ltd, with Meshwa and the original creators duly credited.

In November 2025, Ivy Entertainment Private Limited acquired a portfolio of 1,250 songs, including “Bachpan Ka Pyar”, through an Intellectual Property Rights Acquisition Agreement. Public notices and intimation to Phonographic Performance Ltd. followed. By April 2026, Ivy discovered multiple channels repeatedly lifting the hook line, rhythm and tune for new uploads that had already amassed millions of views.

Urgent Relief Sought Amid Counter-Notifications

Faced with a YouTube deadline to justify its copyright strike or face re-upload of an infringing video, Ivy approached the court on 15 May 2026. The single-judge bench of Justice Tushar Rao Gedela first exempted the company from pre-institution mediation, citing the Supreme Court’s ruling in Yamini Manohar vs. T.K.D. Keerthi .

The plaintiff’s tabulated evidence showed ten representative infringing videos, some claiming to be “official Badshah versions” while others simply looped the protected hook line with minor lyrical additions. Ivy argued it had never licensed these uses and that the defendants’ revenue model directly eroded its own monetisation rights.

Why the Court Found a “Strong Prima Facie Case”

Justice Gedela examined the chain of agreements—from original creators to Meshwa to Ivy—and found clear documentary support for Ivy’s ownership. The judge noted that every infringing act appeared to generate unlawful financial gain for the defendants while causing substantial revenue loss to the rights holder.

Key Observations from the Court

“Having regard thereto, it appears prudent to protect the copyrights of the plaintiff… The plaintiff has been able to demonstrate a prima facie, strong case in its favour as against the defendants.”

“The various agreements/contracts demonstrate ownership of the plaintiff over the copyrights embodied in the song tilt the balance in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall suffer irreparable loss and injury which may not be adequately compensated in monetary terms in case an ex-parte ad-interim injunction order is not passed.”

Immediate Restraints and Revenue Transparency Orders

The court restrained defendants 1 to 3, 5 and all Ashok Kumar-type unknown infringers from using the hook line or distributing the song without authorisation. Separately, defendants 1 to 3 were directed to disclose all revenue generated from any exploitation of “Bachpan Ka Pyar” on their channels.

Summons have been issued and the matter is listed before the Joint Registrar on 10 August 2026 for completion of service and pleadings, with the next court date fixed for 21 October 2026.

Broader Message for Digital Music Platforms

The order underscores that courts will not allow procedural delays or counter-notification tactics to defeat established copyright claims when the plaintiff demonstrates clear chain-of-title and ongoing commercial harm. For creators and acquirers of music catalogues, the ruling serves as timely validation that documented IP acquisitions, promptly publicised, can trigger swift judicial protection against digital piracy.