Back
Must Create Fear in Goons to Prevent Sexual Crimes, Supreme Court Warns
The , in a strongly worded hearing on , directed the to adopt a proactive approach in preventing sexual offences against women and minors, emphasizing that creating a deterrent fear among potential offenders is as critical as punishing those convicted. Taking of a series of brutal rape incidents in the Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR), a bench comprising Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran expressed grave concern over what it termed a "" on the part of law enforcement authorities. The court ordered the immediate establishment of 24-hour monitoring cells for continuous surveillance of vulnerable public spaces, intensified patrolling around educational institutions, and strict action against illegal eateries that serve as gathering points for anti-social elements.
'Create Fear in the Minds of Goons'
The central theme of the hearing was the court's insistence on shifting the focus from post-crime investigation to
.
"What is important is to prevent a crime, not what you do after a crime is committed,"
the bench observed. Justice Pardiwala, addressing senior police officers present in court, underscored the necessity of instilling a fear of the law in those prone to committing sexual offences.
"You need to create fear in the mind of a man who is prone to commit offences. Unless you create fright in the minds of anti-social elements that 'if we do something now, we won't be spared,' you will not be able to prevent the commission of crime,"
he said. The bench also made an emotional appeal, stating that every woman or girl who is molested is "our sister, our mother," and called upon the police to rise to the challenge of ensuring women's safety in the capital.
24-Hour Monitoring Cells and Enhanced Surveillance
A key directive from the court was the setting up of around-the-clock monitoring cells to ensure that CCTV cameras installed in public spaces serve a preventive purpose rather than merely aiding post-incident investigations.
"When we talk about surveillance through CCTV cameras, how far will they help curb crimes if there is no continuous monitoring at different war rooms? The cameras will help you catch the culprit, but how will you prevent such crimes? There has to be a 24-hour cell that keeps monitoring what is happening,"
the bench noted. The court emphasised that mere installation of cameras without active monitoring is insufficient, and called for immediate action on suspicious movements captured on footage.
In addition to technological surveillance, the court stressed the need for to be strengthened, particularly in areas identified as high-risk. The bench pointed to a safety audit conducted by the which revealed that of the 736 parks under its management, only 16 had functional CCTV cameras. The audit classified 190 parks as high-risk, with 520 requiring additional lighting and 323 requiring more cameras. The court directed the police to coordinate with the DDA and other agencies to address these deficiencies urgently.
Focus on Vulnerable Pockets and Illegal Eateries
The Supreme Court specifically highlighted the vulnerability of areas around educational institutions, noting that "hooligans" often harass young girl students near colleges. The bench referred to the presence of hundreds of illegal eateries across Delhi where anti-social elements gather and consume liquor, drawing a parallel to the
Nirbhaya gangrape case in which the accused had consumed alcohol before boarding a bus and committing the crime.
"Start identifying all those vulnerable pockets,"
the court instructed. The bench also noted that prior to the gangrape of a 17-year-old girl at Aastha Kunj Park near Lady Shri Ram College, residents had repeatedly flagged safety concerns to the police, but their complaints went unheeded.
"Nobody paid any heed to it. Therefore, what is important is one-to-one interaction with society. You are the protector,"
Justice Pardiwala said.
Systemic Failures and Accountability
The court's intervention follows a string of heinous incidents, including the gangrape of a minor in Swaroop Nagar and the sexual assault of a 16-year-old girl inside a moving sleeper bus that travelled over 47 km from Greater Noida to Delhi without being intercepted by law enforcement. The bench had earlier observed that public spaces such as parks, roads and buses cannot be permitted to become "," linking public safety to the under . , appointed as amicus curiae, submitted that despite the existence of the 's 'Shishtachar' force—a dedicated unit aimed at preventing sexual harassment of women in public spaces—little information was available about its functioning or effectiveness. She also flagged the issue of and vacancies in the police force.
, appearing for the
, acknowledged that there appeared to be deficiencies in patrolling duties and assured the court that several steps had been taken to increase vigilance. However, the bench remained unconvinced, noting that
"many directives only remain on paper"
and that grassroots-level action was essential.
"If you have to be a little more strict, a little more harsh, do not hesitate,"
the court said, adding that even if some people raised objections invoking Article 21, the police must perform their duty.
and the Role of Fear
Justice Pardiwala repeatedly returned to the theme of
, arguing that potential offenders must be made to believe that committing a crime would lead to severe consequences.
"You need to create a fright, a fear in the mind of a man who is prone to commit such offences... Unless and until you create that fear, that fright in the minds of those anti-social elements, you will not be able to prevent the commission of such crimes,"
he said. The court warned that with the upcoming festival season, miscreants would be more active, and directed the police to remain particularly vigilant.
Broader Implications for Policing
The Supreme Court's observations go beyond the immediate case, signalling a judicial push for a in policing strategies. By emphasising crime prevention over reaction, the court is essentially calling for a more community-oriented and to law enforcement. The directive to establish 24-hour monitoring cells and to engage in regular interaction with residents reflects an expectation that the police will move beyond traditional patrols to a more integrated surveillance system. The court also implicitly questioned the adequacy of police recruitment and resources, noting the vacancies flagged by the amicus.
Legal experts see this as a significant judicial trend where the apex court is not only holding authorities accountable but also prescribing specific operational measures. The case has been adjourned to , when the court will pass a detailed order recording the measures to be undertaken. The outcome could set a precedent for how courts across the country address systemic failures in public safety.
Conclusion
As the Supreme Court continues to monitor the implementation of its directives, the onus is now squarely on the to translate words into action. The message from the bench was clear: women's safety is non-negotiable, and the police must be proactive, visible, and unafraid to enforce the law. The court's insistence on creating fear in the minds of goons is a stark reminder that in the battle against sexual violence, prevention is far more powerful than punishment. With the next hearing set for mid-November, all eyes will be on the capital's law enforcement to see whether the directives will remain on paper or become a reality on the streets.
