Demolishing House Of A Patta-Holder Without Verifying Claim Is Illegal; Right To Property Protected Under Article 300-A: Allahabad High Court - 2025-09-02

Allahabad High Court Slams Authorities for Demolishing House of 'Patta' Holder, Cites Violation of Constitutional Property Rights

ALLAHABAD: The Allahabad High Court has strongly condemned the actions of revenue authorities in Raebareli for demolishing the house of a man who held a valid 'patta' (land lease) for the property. In a scathing order, Justice Alok Mathur criticized the "undue haste" and failure to consider the petitioner's legal claim, underscoring that the right to property is a constitutional right under Article 300-A.

The Court has ordered the Collector of Raebareli to file a personal affidavit explaining the "surprising" manner in which the demolition was carried out and has put the officials on notice for the imposition of exemplary costs.

---

Background of the Case

The petitioner, Babu Lal, approached the High Court after his house and shop in Raebareli district were demolished by the authorities. He contended that the land in question (Khasra No.385/353) was allotted to him via a patta by the Land Management Committee on March 5, 1990, and this was duly recorded in the revenue records.

However, proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code were initiated against him based on a report from the Area Lekhpal, which alleged that he had illegally constructed a house on 'gaon sabha' land recorded as 'banjar' (barren).

Arguments Presented

• Petitioner's Counsel (Sri Afaq Zaki Khan): The petitioner argued that he was the rightful occupant of the land based on the patta granted to him, which had never been cancelled. He informed both the Tehsildar and the appellate authority (District Magistrate) that the subsequent entry of the land as public utility land in revenue records was an error, and proceedings to correct it were underway. He maintained that he could not be considered an unauthorized occupant.

• Respondents' Actions: The Assistant Collector/Tehsildar rejected the petitioner's objections and passed an eviction and penalty order on November 25, 2023. Shockingly, even while the petitioner's appeal against this order was pending before the District Magistrate, the authorities proceeded to demolish his house. The appeal was subsequently rejected on May 28, 2025.

Court's Pivotal Observations

Justice Alok Mathur expressed profound surprise at the conduct of the authorities, questioning how a patta holder could be deemed an illegal occupant, especially when the grant was reflected in the revenue records.

"We are surprised as to the manner of adjudication of such disputes... when the petitioner was granted patta by the Land Management Committee and the patta was itself recorded in the revenue record/khatauni then certainly the petitioner could not have been held to be in illegal occupation of the said property."

The Court highlighted the gravity of demolishing a citizen's home and the high degree of responsibility placed on officials acting under the U.P. Revenue Code.

"To demolish a house of an individual is extremely serious issue and should be done only when there is clear and ample evidence with regard to its illegal occupation... In the present case clearly there is no material which can indicate that the petitioner had been in illegal occupation of the said premises."

Violation of Constitutional Rights

The judgment firmly reiterated the sanctity of the right to property, protected under Article 300-A of the Constitution, which states that no person can be deprived of their property except in accordance with the law.

"In the present case, the petitioner was in possession of the said land on the basis of patta and accordingly he could not have been stated to be in unauthorized occupation of the said land. Not only the authorities did not consider the case of the petitioner but have also shown undue haste in demolishing his house."

Final Decision and Implications

Finding a prima facie case of arbitrary and unlawful action, the Allahabad High Court has demanded accountability. The Court has directed:

1. The Collector, Raebareli, to file a personal affidavit explaining the circumstances.
2. The authority responsible for altering the revenue records to also file an affidavit.
3. Both officials are put on notice as to why exemplary costs should not be imposed upon them for their actions.

The affidavits are to be filed within ten days. The case is scheduled for its next hearing on September 4, 2025, and will be listed among the top ten cases, indicating the urgency and importance the Court has attached to the matter. This order serves as a powerful check on administrative overreach and reinforces the principle that executive action must strictly adhere to the due process of law.