K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, P. SATHASIVAM, J. M. PANCHAL
Malik Mazhar Sultan – Appellant
Versus
Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission – Respondent
ORDER :
K.G. Balakrishnan, CJI.
IA No. 56
On 4-1-2007, Malik Mazhar Sultan (3) v. U.P. Public Service Commission,(2008) 17 SCC 703, this Court had given certain directions regarding the selection and appointment of members of the subordinate judicial officers in various courts. In the tabular form, the number of vacancies are notified by the High Court/Public Service Commission. It was directed that the further vacancies that may arise due to elevation or death or otherwise, 10% of the posts shall be notified and this is referred at para 15 of the order; it is further stated: (Malik Mazhar case1, SCC p. 711)
2. It has been pointed out by the counsel appearing for the various High Courts that 10% of the sanctioned posts are notified in some States. A large number of posts are to be notified whereas there was corresponding number of vacancies to be filled if the candidates are selected in the select list. There may be an expectation for such candidates to get appointment and this creates unwanted litigation by the candidates and it is pray
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.