SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 664

K.VENKATASWAMI, J.JAGANNADHA RAO
Bina Murlidhar Hemdev – Appellant
Versus
Kanhaiyalal Lokram Hemdev – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M. Jagannadha Rao, J. - Leave granted.

This appeal is filed by the four plaintiffs, the widow and children of late Murlidhar Lokram Hemdev who died intestate on or about 8.5.1976. The appeal is directed against the order of the High Court of Bombay in Appeal No. 1019 of 1997 dated 12.9.97 confirming the order of the learned Single Judge dated 11.7.1997 in an application under Order 39 Rule 1 C.P.C. in Special Suit No. 83 of 1997.

2. The facts of the case are as follows :

3. There was an unregistered partnership w.e.f. 27.7.1964 (to which, of course late Murlidhar was not party) under a deed dated 4.9.1964 between five persons who were in two groups, the Sankhala group having 66 share and the Jains having 34 share. The said firm purchased land admeasuring31,075 sq. feet in Thane, with the intention of developing and selling the same. This firm is called the ‘main firm’ in these proceedings before us.

4. The main group entered into a sub-partnership, a registered firm dated 29-7-1964 with Lokram group consisting of 4 partners : (1) Kanhaiyalal Lokram Hemdev, (ii) Murlidhar Lokram Hemdev (deceased) (father of plaintiffs-appellants), (iii) Kanhaiyalal Sewaram and (iv) Srichand Dh








































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top