What is the distinction between a review petition and a recall petition in constitutional law? What is the principle of natural justice regarding adverse orders and hearing in contempt/licensing cases? What are the directions and outcomes when a recall petition leads to recalling a paragraph directing licence cancellations without hearing affected parties?

Key Points: - Writ petitions under Article 32 treated as recall petitions to recall directions passed without hearing affected parties (!) (!) - Fundamental principle of natural justice: no adverse orders against a party without hearing him (!) - Court recalled the directions in paragraph 40 of the earlier judgment All Bengal Licensees Association v. Raghabendra Singh & Ors. and disposed of the writ petitions with those directions (!) - Interim High Court stay of licences during pendency; licences cancelled by contempt order challenged; recall petition addressed the lack of hearing in cancellations (!) (!) (!) - The order cancelling licences in paragraph 40 was passed without hearing; petition treated as recall under Article 32 to address due process (!) (!) - The Court clarified that if grievances exist regarding licence grants or policy, they may be challenged in appropriate proceedings before the proper court (!)

What is the distinction between a review petition and a recall petition in constitutional law?

What is the principle of natural justice regarding adverse orders and hearing in contempt/licensing cases?

What are the directions and outcomes when a recall petition leads to recalling a paragraph directing licence cancellations without hearing affected parties?