KURIAN JOSEPH, R.BANUMATHI
Anil Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT) of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R. Banumathi, J.
Leave granted.
2. These appeals arise from the order of the High Court of Delhi in and by which the High Court has cancelled the bail granted to the respondents-accused by two separate orders dated 31.05.2017 and 08.09.2017. By virtue of the first impugned order, bail granted to Anil Kumar Yadav (A4) was cancelled and by the second impugned order, bail granted to other accused were cancelled.
3. The case of prosecution is that on 21.10.2015, Rohit Bansal (injured witness) along with his friends Vineet, Sonu, Rupesh (deceased) and Monu had gone to Shanghai Club, Hauz Khas in two separate cars, i.e. Santro being registration No.UP-16-AM-6317 and Honda Civic being registration No.DL-7CF-4118. At around midnight 12.00-12.15, while dancing in the club, Rohit Bansal's hand struck an individual to whom he said "sorry". On this, the said individual abused and questioned Rohit Bansal and quarrel started between the two groups and the said individual took a glass from one of his friends and hit the complainant-Rohit Bansal; but the matter was pacified by the bouncers/security personnel of the club. Thereafter, the complainant-Rohit Bansal and his friends were sent out o
Gobarbhai Naranbhai Singala v. State of Gujarat
Brij Nandan Jaiswal v. Munna alias Munna Jaiswal
Kanwar Singh Meena v. State of Rajasthan
State of U.P. through CBI v. Amarmani Tripathi
Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal v. State of T.N.
Ram Govind Upadhyay v. Sudarshan Singh
Masroor v. State of Uttar Pradesh
State of Bihar v. Rajballav Prasad alias Rajballav Prasad Yadav alias Rajballabh Yadav
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.