DELHI HIGH COURT
S.P.GARG
Rohit Bansal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.P. Garg, J. The instant petition under Section 439(2) read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner-Rohit Bansal to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 27.2.2017 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in FIR No.1187/2015 registered under Sections 302/308/201/212/34 IPC at Police Station Hauz Khas whereby the respondent No.2-Anil Yadav (hereinafter referred to as `the respondent') was granted regular bail. The petition is contested by `the respondent'.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP and learned Senior counsel for `the respondent' and have examined the file. Undisputedly, `the respondent' is facing trial in case FIR No.1187/2015 registered under Sections 302/308/201/212/34 IPC.
3. Briefly stated the facts as projected in the charge-sheet are that on 22.10.15 on receipt of DD No.10A regarding admission of injured Rupesh Tanwar and Rohit Bansal at Trauma Centre, AIIMS, ASI Dalbir Singh went there and lodged First Information Report after recording petitioner's statement. The petitioner informed that on 21.10.2015, he along with his friends Vinit, Sonu, Rupesh (since deceased) and Monu had gone
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.