T.N.R.TIRUMALPAD
Wahengbam Tomchou Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chingakham Amusna Singh – Respondent
2. The short facts are as follows :
On 17-1-1959, the respondent filed a complaint under S. 430 I.P.C. against the petitioners and after Police Report and after summoning the petitioners the case was posted to 10-8-1959. On that date the complainant was absent and the Magistrate passed the order that the accused be discharged under S. 259 Cr. P.C. Shortly thereafter, the respondent appeared in Court and filed a petition stating that he was present in the Court compound, but that be did not hear the case being called out and that he heard only just then that the case had been struck off because of his absence. He, therefore, requested that the complaint may be restored. Thereupon the Magistrate passed another order on the same date that the explanation given by the complainant for his non-appearance appeared quite possible and was accepted and that the dismissal order was therefore set aside and the case restored to file and he ordered issue of summons to the parties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.