SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(P&H) 40

A.N.BHANDARI
Leo Roy Frey – Appellant
Versus
R. Prasad – Respondent


Judgment

A.N.Bhandari, J.

1. This petition under Section 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act raises the question whether the respondents have published matter which is intended or reasonably calculated to prejudice the fair trial of a criminal case.

2. The petitioner in this case is one Mr. Leo Roy Frey, an American stock broker, while the respondents are the Editor, Printer and Publisher of the Statesman and the Editor, Printer and Publisher of the Tribune.

3. On 23-6-1957 Mr. Dana, a citizen of Cuba and Mr. Frey, a citizen of California, who were travelling to Pakistan in a luxury American car, presented themselves at the Attari Road Land Customs Station for completing the customs formalities. They filled in the baggage declaration forms which were handed over to them. Mr. Freys declaration form was found to be correct in all particulars except only that he had omitted to declare a. 28 revolver which was recovered from his possession. Mr. Danas form was not found to be correct, for a search of the car in which these two passengers were travelling revealed the presence of a secret chamber above the petrol tank which contained Indian currency of the value of Rs. 8,50,000/- and United St








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top