SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1191

K.RAMASWAMY, K.S.PARIPOORNAN
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Mohabir Singh – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.

2. The facts in C.A. Nos. 5337-41 of 1990 are sufficient for disposal of all these appeals.

3. The respondents had entered into an agreement of sale on March 4, 1989, to purchase from the vendors. Virender Singh and Rupinder Singh, a portion of house (kothi No. 519) situated in Model Town, Jallandhar, of an extent of 20 marlas for a consideration valued at Rs. 9,700/- per marla and they appear to have paid as earnest money of Rs. 95,000/-. The sale deed was required to be executed and registered before November 30, 1989. Few days prior to the aforesaid date the instrument appears to have been valued at Rs. 50,000/- and stamp duty was paid and presented for the same. The Sub-Registrar, Jallandhar, opined that prevailing market value was not less than Rs. 15,000/- per marla and, on that basis, he required the vendee to revise the instrument and fix the consideration for the purpose of stamp duty and registration charges on the revised valuation. He formed his opinion on the basis of the instructions issued by the Government in Ex.PW. dated August 4, 1988. Feeling aggrieved, the respondents filed writ petition in













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top