SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 74

B.L.HANSARIA, G.N.RAY
Vijay Magee – Appellant
Versus
S. M. Rao – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hansaria, J.--Leave granted.

2. The appellant has a bundle of grievances, starting from the acquittal of respondent No.1 (Principal Manager, Victoria Senior Secondary School) by Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi, before whom appeal was filed by this respondent against her conviction by the Metropolitan Magistrate under section 341 of the Penal Code. Against that order of acquittal, the appellant approached the High Court in appeal; but the High Court has dismissed the same on the ground that the appellant has no right to file appeal. Some observation has also been made on the merits. The High Court, ultimately found no illegality in the order of acquittal passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge.

3. As the alleged offence related to locking of a room which was admittedly in possession of the appellant at one point of time, other grievances of the appellant are in a way consequential to the wrong which, according to her, was committed in keeping her out. There were some goods in the room; and so, damages for non-return/stealing of the same have been claimed. The further links in the chain of grievances are that because of this high-handedness , the appellant even came to be di














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top