SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 23

1996(1) Supreme (Cr.) 294
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.
Textile Processors Association -Petitioner
versus
The Chief Secretary, State of Gujarat & Ors.      -Respondents
SLP (C) No. 617 of 1995
Decided on 4-1-1996

IMPORTANT POINT
The averments in SLP are to be gone into not by SC but by the High Court. So exercise of jurisdiction u/A. 136 is declined.

Headnote:Constitution of India-Art. 136-Leave to appeal against order of High Court-High Court directing textile Processors to contribute 1% of the gross turnover to purify water pollutted by discharge of their effluents in canal-In fact no such pollution, as effluents are treated in treatment plant-Contribution is eating capital as units running in losses-Whether a fit case u/A. 136 ? (No)-Proper course-To apply for review to High Court & seek appropriate direction. (Para 3)

ORDER

Delay condoned.

2. This Special Leave Petition filed by the Association seeks leave to file the appeal. The main grievance sought to be brought to our notice by Shri G. Ramaswamy, learned senior counsel is that some industries of the petitioner-Association are outside the Zone and effluents discharged from these industries are not directly leading to Kharicut Canal affecting the water in 11 villages identified by the High Court. Though the High Court had given positive finding in favour of the industries, nonetheless the High Court had directed them to contribute 1 per cent of the gross turnover. Many an industries which the petitioner-Association is representing, are running in losses. Consequently, each industry is required to pay the amount as directed by the High Court from their corpus and not from the profits.

3. Dr. A.M. Singhvi, the learned Senior counsel further points out that the units are already having temporary treatment plan and secondary treatment plan and they accumulate the effluents so that discharge would not arise. Unless the industries start working, it would be difficult to generate income by these industries, to comply with the directions issued by the High Court. Therefore, by virtue of the order passed by the High Court practically all the industries, as found by the High Court, though were not discharging the effluents polluting the water leading to the 11 villages, were prevented to run the operations. Consequently, they are put to great loss. In view of these averments, we think it is a matter to be gone into not by us but by the High Court. We are not inclined to exercise the jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution for the reason they are matters for the High Court to be looked into. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes to file the application for review and in fitness of things, it would be open to each industry affected by the order to approach the High Court and place necessary facts before it and seek appropriate direction, if deemed necessary. Liberty is given to them to file the application as expeditiously as possible. It would be open to the High Court to dispose of the same according to exigency.

4. The S.L.P. is accordingly disposed of.

Order accordingly.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top