SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 19

G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
Rajbir Singh, HFS-II – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


ORDER

Application for impleading is dismissed as withdrawn.

2. Leave granted.

3. We decline to express any opinion on merits since M.P. Sharma, who was appointed to an additional post as a general candidate pursuant to the direction issued by the High Court in Writ Petition No. 13700/90, on July 8, 1990 while the appellant was regularly selected by the Public Service Commission and appointed earlier to him, is not made a party to these proceedings. The main thrust of the argument is on inter se seniority between the appellant and M.P. Sharma. But in the absence of M.P. Sharma being impleaded as a party respondent to these proceedings, we cannot be into the question. Under these circumstances, we do find that though the High Court dismissed the Writ Petition in limine, it would be open to the appellant to approach the High Court, if so advised, to file a fresh writ petition impleading the affected parties and seek his remedy according to law.

4. The appeal is dismissed accordingly. No costs.

Appeal dismissed accordingly.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top