JUDGMENT

G.N. Ray, J.-Leave granted.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated October 8, 1991 passed by the Division Bench of Gauhati High Court in Civil Revision Case No. 74 (SH) of 1989. The aforesaid decision was made by the Division Bench of the High Court on a reference by a learned Single Judge of the Gauhati High Court in the said Civil Revision Case No. 74 (SH) of 1989. The learned Single Judge having disagreed with a decision by a Single Bench of the Gauhati High Court in Union of India v. D.S. Narula & Co.1 in Civil Revision No. 33(H) of 1985 that no revision lies against the appellate judgment passed in the appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, referred the Revision Case to the Division Bench for deciding the maintainability of the Revision Petition filed under Rule 36A of the Rules for the Administration of Justice and Police in the Khasi and Janitia Hills 1937, against the appellate order dated March 28, 1968 passed by the learned Additional Deputy Commissioner. East Khasi Nille. Shillong arising out of the order dated July 21, 1984 passed by the Assistant to the Deputy Commissioner at Shillong rejecting the o