JUDGMENT

Hansaria, J.-The appellant, who was once accepted by respondent No. 5-Ram Chandra (hereinafter the respondent), as a tenant when proceeding under Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (Tenancy Act) was initiated against him, has lost that right when the res-pondent agitated the matter again under Section 82 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956. Shortly put, this is the grievance of the appellant, and the same is well founded as it would appear from what is being stated later.

2. In the first proceeding, the respondent had sought eviction of the appellant by invoking Section 177 of the Tenancy Act on the ground that th latter had become liable for ejectment because of using the land contrary to the purpose for which it was leased. The respondent lost that suit on the ground that the land being part of Jagir he had no locus standi to file the suit, as Jagir stood abolished by the force of the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act, 1952 (Jagir Act). That order was passed on 30.6.1963 and was confirmed even by the Board of Revenue on 19.1.1978.

3. In 1987 the respondent filed an application before the Collector under Section 82 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act for making