SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 12

G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
U. P. Kattha Factories Association – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted. Heard counsel on both sides.

2. The facts are that pursuant to the policy dated September 12, 1983, industrial units based on various forest produce i.e. Khair Wood were allowed to be set up in the State. Appellant is an association of the industries. The Government gave relaxation on February 25, 1984 giving liberty to the Director of Industies to encourage small scale industries on the ground that those who would not operate their industries from the forest wood may be considered for the licence and that they would purchase Khair Wood from outside the State. The respondent No. 4 had given provisional registration of his proposed S.I. units for a period of one year on February 11, 1986.

3. The Government thereafter introduced complete ban on registration from December 11, 1986. The appellant Association had applied for cancellation or relaxation of the ban imposed including the 4th respondent but the Director refused to acceed to the same. Consequently, the appellant filed a writ petition in the High Court. The Division Bench of the High Court of Allahabad in the order dated May 3, 1991 in Writ Petition No. 1828/91 dismissed the writ petition holding that the m





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top