SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 182

FAIZAN UDDIN, N.P.SINGH
Joginder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jogindero – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Faizan Uddin, J.-This appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh dated March 12, 1982 in Regular Second Appeal No. 172/1972 reversing the judgment and decree dated 11.1.1972 passed by the Additional District Judge, Amritsar in Civil Appeal No. 307/1971 and restoring the judgment and decree dated 1.2.1969 passed by the Sub-Judge, Class II, Taran-Taran in case No. 32/1967.

2. Smt. Jogindero alias Gindo and Smt. Chhindo, plaintiffs/Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are the daughters of Smt. Soman, defendants/Respondent No. 4. Shingara Singh, plaintiff/Respondent No. 3 is sister s son of Smt. Soman. The land in suit as admeasuring 60 Kenals and 17 marlas belonged to Smt. Soman. According to the plaintiffs, Smt. Soman, defendant/Respondent No. 4 made a gift of said land in favour of the plaintiffs by a registered gift deed dated April 12, 1960 with delivery of possession. The defendant No. 1 Surain Singh (who died during the pendency of the Second Appeal before the High Court and is represented by his legal representatives) and Bur Singh, defendant No. 2/Respondent No. 5 herein are tenants in respect of t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top