SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 211

J.S.VERMA, S.P.BHARUCHA, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central I, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Empire Estate, Bombay – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Bharucha, J.-There being a conflict in the decisions of the High Courts, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred to this Court, under Section 257 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the following question :

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that there should be two assessments, one for the period from 1.6.1973 to 12.1.1974 and the other for the period from 13.1.1974 to 30.6.1974, as the assessee s case did not fall within the provisions of Section 187(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961."

2. The relevant assessment year is A.Y. 1975-76. The relevant accounting year ended on 30th June, 1974.

3. The assessee is a partnership firm. It was constituted under a deed of partnership dated 18th July, 1968. Its three partners were Mrs. Ellen Keki Modi, Mr. Rustom Keki Modi and Ms. Maneck Keki Modi. Mrs. Ellen Modi died on 12th January, 1974. There being no provision in the deed of partnership contemplating the continuance of the partnership in the event of the death of a partner, the partnership stood dissolved. No deed of dissolution was executed but the surviving partners executed a fresh deed of partnership for car

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top