SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 196

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
Lakshamana Yatendrulu – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. Ramaswamy, J.-The petitioners seek to question the vires of Sections 2 (22), 2 (27) and Sections 47 to 55 in Chapter V of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable & Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act, 1987 (30 of 1987) (for short,"the Act"). But at the time of hearing Shri K. Parasaran, their learned senior counsel, restricted his arguments to the validity of Sections 50 to 55. The petitioner in the first writ petition is Peetadhipati of the institution known as "Mumukshu Jana Maha Peetham" [for short, Peetham ] in Peda Muktevi village of Movva Mandal in Krishna District of Andhra Pradesh. It was averred therein that the Peetham was founded by one Seetharama Yetendrulu an advocate in the year 1938 and he became a sanyasi. His main philosophy was equality and universality of all religions faiths, good character, gratuitous conduct and devotion to God, far more important than mere rituals. He formed Mumukshu Jana Samajam in 1950. He published several books under that banner. He was running a Telugu magazine by name Mumukshuvu. He started school for the children. He was managing a temple of Lakshmipati Swamy. The devotees collected funds for all those projects by voluntar
















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top