SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 272

K.S.PARIPOORNAN, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Marys School – Appellant
Versus
Cantonment Board, Meerut – Respondent


ORDER

Heard counsel for the parties. Leave granted.

2. These appeals are preferred against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court allowing the writ petition filed by the Cantonment Board, Meerut and remitting the matter to the appellate authority with a direction that the appellate authority shall give an opportunity to the petitioners to comply with Section 87 of the Cantonment Act. The question pertains to the asssessibility of the buildings owned by the petitioner to property tax. The appellants case is that by virtue of Section 99 of the Act, they are exempt from tax. The assessing authority held that they do not satisfy the requirement of Section 99 and, therefore, not entitled to exemption. Against that order the appellants filed an appeal but they did not deposit the tax as required by Section 87. Even so, the appeal was allowed by the appellate authority on the ground that the appellants are entitled to the benefit of Section 99. It is against the order that the writ petition was filed by the Cantonment Board in the High Court. The High Court held that the requirement of Section 87 is mandatory and accordingly remitted the matter with the above directions.

3. Sri Sorabjee







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top