SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 233

K.VENKATASWAMI, M.M.PUNCHHI
Surjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Punchhi, J.-Leave granted.

2. Is the hypothetical claim of the appellant for medical reimbursement valid in the facts and circumstances of this case is the straight question which falls for determination in this appeal.

3. The appellant, Surjit Singh (now retired) while posted as a Deputy Superintendent Police, Anandpur Sahib, Distt. Roper, Punjab, developed a heart-condition on 22.12.1987 and that very day went on a short leave extending it uptill 10.1.1988, on medical grounds. It remains unclarified on the record of this case as to what steps the appellant took thereafter to meet his ailment. However, six months later he obtained leave from his superiors from 15.6.1988 to 8.9.1988 and went to England to visit his son. It is the case of the appellant that while in England, he fell ill due to his hear problem and as an emergency case, was admitted in Dudley Road, Hospital Brimingham. After diagnosis he was suggested treatment at a named alternate place. Thus to save himself the appellant, got himself admitted and operated upon in Humana Hospital, Wellington, London for a Bye-Pass Surgery. He claims to have been hospitalised from 25.7.1988 to 4.8.1988. A sum of Rs. 3 lacs alle














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top