SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 345

A.S.ANAND, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Hari Chand – Appellant
Versus
State Of Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Majmudar, J.-This is an appeal by two appellants who were accused Nos. 4 and 5 respectively before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No. 55 of 1975. They have preferred this appeal under Section 379 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C. ) read with Section 2 of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 8th December 1978 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 257 of 1976 by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. By the said decision the High Court set aside the order of acquittal of the appellants rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in the aforesaid Sessions Case and convicted both the appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code (in brief IPC ) for having caused murders of Sohan Lal and Kanahiya and accordingly they were sentenced to imprisonment for life. The appellants were also convicted under Section 325 read with Section 34, IPC for having caused grievous hurt to Ram Pal and were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year each. They were also convicted under Section 323 read with Secti













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top