SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 285

B.L.HANSARIA, G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
Firdosh Fatima – Appellant
Versus
Firdosh Begum – Respondent


ORDER

These two appeals arise from a Full Bench judgment of the High Court of Allahabad in Hakim Singh v. Shi Sagar & Ors.1. The U.P. State Legislature enacted U.P. Amendment Act 33 of 1972 amending U.P. High Court (Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) Act, 1962 and enacted Section 4 thereof which reads as under :-

"Abolition of appeals from the judgment or order of one Judge of the High Court made in the exercise of writ jurisdiction in certain cases -(1) No appeal, arising from a suit or proceeding instituted or commenced, whether prior or subsequent to the commencement of this section, shall lie to the High Court from a judgment or order of one Judge of the High Court, made in the exercise of jurisdiction conferred by Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution, in respect of a judgment, decree or order made or purported to be made by the Board of Revenue under the United Provinces Land Revenue Act, 1901 or the U.P. Tenancy Act, 1939, or the Uttar Pradesh Urban Areas Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1956, or the Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960, or by the Director of Consolidation (including any other officer purporting to exerc







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top