SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 458

G.B.PATTANAIK, KULDIP SINGH
Municipal Corporation Of Greater Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Mafatlal Industries – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G.B. Pattanaik, J.-These appeals by special leave are directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of Bombay High Court dated 8.2.1993 arising out of writ petition nos. 539 of 1981 and 1606 of 1983 respectively.

2. The facts are not in dispute namely the respondents industries had got their guest houses in Bombay and the Municipal Corporation of Bombay treating the premises falling under Category C under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act raised a bill for payment of electricity duty. The respondents being aggrieved by the said billing filed writ petition in the Bombay High Court contending inter alia that the premises having been used as guest houses for the occupation of the employees of the company, the same could not have been categorised as Category R and the order of the Municipal Corporation is invalid and inoperative. The appellant - Municipal Corporation in its return filed before the learned Single Judge took the stand that the tariff under Category R is exclusively meant for premises used as private residential premises and tariff under Category C is meant for all non industrial premises and a guest house maintained by a commercial undertaking even




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top