ORDER

This is an appeal filed by the appellant from jail under Section 19 of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as TADA). It appears that initially the charge-sheet was submitted against the appellant and the co-accused Raj Pal under Sectioin 394, 392 and 397 IPC and Section 5 of TADA Act. But at the trial the accused stood charged for offences under Sections 392 , 397 and 394 IPC before the Designated Court. Rohtak at Sonepat.

2. The prosecution case in short is that 12.4.90 when PW 7. Suresh was being accompanied by his brother PW 8. Subhash was going on a scooter to village Gadwal from Gonana, both the said accused suddenly appeared armed with pistol and they made an attempt to stop the scooter, but his brother Subhash did not allow to do so. The accused however caught hold of the scooter by its handle and pointed pistol on the back of Suresh urging him to handover whatever valuable was in his possession. Out of fear Suresh handed over a purse containing Rs.1775/- and his wrist watch and the wrist watch of his brother Subhash was also removed by the other accused Rajpal forcibly. Thereafter, an attempt was made to snatch the sc