SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 250

1996(2) SUPREME 363
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and G.B Pattanaik, JJ.
Municipal Committee, Abohar -Appellant
versus
Regional Commissioner, E.S.I. Corp.& Anr. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 3508 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 19933/94)
Decided on 2-2-1996

IMPORTANT POINT
The coverage of employees of Municipal Corporation under ESIC Act, 1948 is per se illegal in the circumstances of the case.

Headnote:Employees State Insurance Act, 1948-Sections 45A and 75-Constitution of India-Art. 136-Employees of Appellant running Patel Water Works-Held by Insurance Court and the High Court as covered under the Act-Appeal to Supreme Court by SLP-Whether employees of appellant are rightly covered under the Act? (No)

       Held : The question is whether the employees of the Municipal Corporation are also covered under the Act ? The employees of the Corporation are governed by the statutory rules made under the Act and in some cases in other States the benefits of the Govt. scales of pay etc. have been extended. However, the fact remains that they are provided with the health scheme and also eligible to medical facilities and reimbursement of the amounts spent by the concerned employees. Under these circumstances, the coverage of employees under the Act is per se illegal. (Para 3)

ORDER

Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana dated 5.10.1993 in F.A.O. No. 589/93 dismissing the appeal as usual in limine. The admitted facts are that the appellant-Municipal Committee has been running water works known as Patel Water Works. The employees working in the Water Works Department are now sought to be covered under the provisions of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short the Act ). When notice was issued to the appellant, they objected to the coverage of employees under the Act. Therefore, an order has been passed under section 45-A of the Act. Challenging thereto, an appeal was filed under Section 75 of the Act. The insurance Court has confirmed that the employees are covered under the Act. Accordingly, when challenged, the High Court in the first appeal dismissed the same. Thus this appeal by special leave.

3. The question is whether the employees of the Municipal Corporation are also covered under the Act ? The employees of the Corporation are governed by the statutory rules made under the Act and in some cases in other States the benefits of the Govt. scales of pay etc. have been extended. However, the fact remains that they are provided with the health scheme and also eligible to medical facilities and reimbursement of the amounts spent by the concerned employees. Under these circumstances, the coverage of employees under the Act is per se illegal.

4. The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.

Appeal allowed.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top