1996(2) SUPREME 560
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.
S.C. Mandakki etc. -Appellant
versus
The Director of Health and Family Welfare Service etc. -Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 3497 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 3253 of 1994
with
Civil Appeal No. 3498 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 3252 of 1994)
Decided on 29-1-1996
Held : Though in view of the above reasoning, the appellant is not entitled to the payment of the increment, however, the arrears paid so far need not be recovered. He will be considered for increment as soon as he completed his ten years of service unless and otherwise he become eligible for promotion in the meanwhile. (Para 8)
Understood. I am ready to analyze the legal document you provide.
Please paste the content of the document (or the specific section you wish me to review) within the
Example of expected output format:
Key Point: The contract was signed on January 1st. Reference: (!) (!)
I am standing by for your input.
ORDER
Leave granted.
2. We have heard the counsel on both sides. The appellant was appointed as a Junior Laboratory Technician in the Department of Family Health and Family Welfare Service on May 3, 1979. He had applied on September 16, 1986 for transfer and posting him as Ist Divisional Assistant in the same Department. By proceedings dated October 28, 1986, he was posted as a 1st Divisional Assistant in the same department. Karnataka Civil Services (Time Bound Advancement) Rules, 1983) provide for giving advance increment, under Rule 16 thereof to the candidate who has completed 10 years of service but was not promoted to a higher post. The appellant had applied for grant of the said benefit in 1989. By proceedings dated October 15, 1989, the same was rejected. Consequently, he filed a representation in the Administrative Tribunal which by its order dated January 13, 1993 in Application No. 1545/92 dismissed the same. Thus this appeal by special leave.
3. Shri P.R. Ramesh, the learned counsel for the appellant, contended that the descriptive criteria prescribed in Rule 3 clause (a) of the Rules must be read analogous to the work charged service or the service put up by a local candidate which would only be excluded. Since the appellant has been discharging his duties from May 3, 1979 carrying the same scale of pay though of descriptive nature of the post, the appellant had completed ten years of service as on May 19, 1989 and that, therefore, he is eligible to the increment under the Rules. Shri Veerappa, the learned counsel for the State, contended that proviso to Rule 6 of the Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 as amended in 1976 is applicable to the facts of this case. By its operation, the appellant having voluntarily opted to get posted as a Junior Assistant, though in the same department, for the purpose of promotion, he having become junior most, unless he completes 10 years of service along with his companions, he is not eligible to be promoted. Thereafter, he becomes eligible to be considered. The Tribunal, therefore, was right in rejecting the claim of the appellant.
4. Having regard to the facts and respective conditions, the only question is that whether the appellant is entitled to tag his service from May 3, 1979 to October 28, 1986 for the computation of the 10 years period under the Rules for getting advance increment. Rule 3 of the Rules reads thus:
"3. Grant of time bound advancement and conditions of eligibility :
The Appointing Authority shall grant to a Government servant who is holding a post carrying pay scale specified in column (2) of the Schedule the selection time scale of pay specified in the corresponding Column (3) thereof, if :
(a) he has put in a service of not less than ten years in the post held by him excluding his service as a local candidate work-charged employees or any other service which does not count for the purpose of determining seniority for promotion;
Rule 6 of the Seniority Rules reads thus:
"The transfer of a person in public interest from one class or grade of a service to another class or grade carrying the same pay or scale of pay shall not be treated as first appointment to the latter for purposes of seniority; and the seniority of a person so transferred shall be determined with reference to his first appointment to the class or grade from which he was transferred:
Provided that, where the transfer is made at the request of the officer, he shall be placed in the seniority list of the class or grade or service to which he is transferred below all the officers borne on that class or grade of service on or before the date of the transfer :
Provided further, that the seniority of a person transferred in public interest vis-a-vis the person actually holding the post in the Class or Grade to which he is transferred shall be determined on the date of such transfer with reference to his first appointment to the class or grade from which he was tr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.