SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 455

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, K.S.PARIPOORNAN
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Haldwani – Appellant
Versus
Indian Wood Products LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

Heard counsel for both the parties.

Leave granted.

2. The only question in this batch of appeals is where the transaction of sale of specified agricultural produce is between a trader and a trader, whether the purchasing trader is liable to pay the market fee in cases where the selling trader does not collect it from him. This question has to be answered with reference to the language of Section 17(iii)(b) which reads as under :

"17. Powers of the Committee.-A Committee shall, for the purposes of this Act, have the power to-

(iii) levy and collect :

(b) market fee, which shall be payable on transactions of sale of specified agricultural produce in the market area at such rates, being not less than one percentum and not more than two percentum of the price of the agricultural produce so sold, as the State Government may specify by notification, and such fee shall be realised in the following mnner-

(1) if the produce is sold through a commission agent may realise the market fee from the purchaser and shall be liable to pay the same to the Committee;

(2) if the produce is purchased directly by a trander from a producer the trader shall be liable to pay


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top