SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 465

B.L.HANSARIA, G.N.RAY
Lakhi Baruah – Appellant
Versus
Padma Kanta Kalita – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G.N. Ray, J.-Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal is directed against judgment dated December 17, 1993 passed by the High Court of Guwahati in Second Appeal No. 46 of 1993. By the aforesaid judgment, the High Court dismissed the appeal preferred against judgment and decree dated March 29, 1993 passed by the learned Assistant District Judge. Sonitpur in Title Appeal No. 7 of 1992 reversing the judgment and decree dated February 28, 1992 passed by the learned Munsif. IInd Court. Tezpur passed in Title Suit No. 55 of 1981.

3. Shri Pushpa Kanta kalita and Shri Ragma Kanta Kalita, namely plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2. Instituted Title Suit No. 55 of 1961 in the Court of learned Munsif at Tazpur against defendants Smt. Alkon Baruan, Shri Dakshi Baruan, Shri Jiban Baruan and Smt. Sonmal Baruan for a declaration that the plaintiff No. 1 was the sole and lawful owner of the lands in Schedule A to the plaint and for further declaration that the registered Sale Deed of 1950 of Tezpur was forged null and void and was inggerative so far as the plaintiff No. 1 was concerned and also for a declaration that plaintiff No. 2 had right title and interest in the lands


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top